2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49108-6_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Situated Ability: A Case from Higher Education on Digital Learning Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, much of the focus to date has been on people with disabilities or cognitive disorders. We argue that users with or without any known physical or cognitive disabilities, face certain challenges in their interaction with these DLEs used in HE, regardless of their particular abilities [21]. This idea is supported by Martha Nussbaum (2004, p. 341) in [12] (p. 207), who Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal -IxD&A, N. 43, 2019-20, pp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, much of the focus to date has been on people with disabilities or cognitive disorders. We argue that users with or without any known physical or cognitive disabilities, face certain challenges in their interaction with these DLEs used in HE, regardless of their particular abilities [21]. This idea is supported by Martha Nussbaum (2004, p. 341) in [12] (p. 207), who Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal -IxD&A, N. 43, 2019-20, pp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Saplacan (2020, p. 264) has conceptualized situated abilities further, suggesting the following definition: 'Situated ability is the ability to comprehend, manage, or find the meaning in the interaction with a digital system'. Situated abilities have been applied in some studies, for instance on digital learning environments (Saplacan, 2020) and intelligent systems (Saplacan et al, 2020), but does not seem to have been discussed in the context of information searching or search system development.…”
Section: The Concept Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How do we describe and critically evaluate the different ways that technology represent, protect, and support or weaken human autonomy? Within this theme, we include questions about how we can design these interactions, i.e., how to design for capabilities [26], prolonged mastery [27], or situated abilities [28,29], how to design for perception and meaning-making when imperceptible interaction is the basis, how to design for interaction with moving things like robots [23,24,29,30] or autonomous vehicles? We also think that a debate about the (human) values and foci of the 4th shift in interaction design / HCI is timely, as are possible mechanisms and design concepts for increasing human autonomy [31].…”
Section: Perspectives On "Imperceptible Interactions With Autonomous mentioning
confidence: 99%