European legislation obligates member states to have a full-time postgraduate GP specialty training for ≥3 years, with a minimum of 6 months spent in general practice. Across Europe, GP specialty training varies from 3 years (for example, in the UK and the Netherlands) to 6 years (Finland), with training time in general practices varying between 6 months (Austria) and 4 years (Norway). Recently, across Europe a strong movement in favour of extending the minimum duration of GP specialty training from the current 3 years to 4 or even 5 years has developed. 1,2 Supporters of this measure state that this will 'build the same level as specialty as other disciplines' and therefore strengthen GPs' standing across Europe. 3,4 This is important because a strong primary care is needed to have a high-quality healthcare system accessible for all citizens, in which GPs function as key stakeholders. 5,6 However, not every country values GPs in this way. Across Europe GPs' positions vary from being a strong gatekeeper with free access for patients to easily accessible secondary care and paid GP visits. Another argument for extending the duration is that more time spent in training will give trainees 'greater exposure to real world setting', and therefore better developed competencies important for future GPs. 2 Recently, extension of GP training programmes in Scotland and the West of Ireland reported positive results, whereby trainees from these programmes felt better prepared for independent practice. 7,8 The extended period of general practice training in particular (2 years instead of 1) was valued by the trainees. Although we recognise that becoming a GP takes time and requires the mastery of a broad range of competencies, 2,4 in this editorial we will argue that merely extending GP specialty training might not be the right measure to better prepare trainees or to enhance GPs' standing.