“…This explicit awareness also includes the relationship of ethnographers with their interlocutors, emotional and intellectual involvement, proximity and distance, as well as navigation between different groups and power structures (Cunha, 2002;Liebling, 2001;Nielsen, 2010;Sparks, 2002;Sloan & Drake, 2013;King & Wincup, 2000). (Cunha, 2014: 50) As researchers we have been questioning at different times how our diverse identity belongings undermined or afforded contact with different social groups inside the confinement settings (see also Crewe, 2014;Rowe, 2014;Piacentini, 2007;Sparks, 2002;Liebling, 2001;Arendell, 1997). In Gomes's first study, if age was an element that facilitated more empathetic contact with younger male and female prisoners, gendered and age-related ethnic affiliation in some cases acted as an obstacle in the interviewing process, in particular with interviews conducted with adult male Roma prisoners.…”