2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12119-017-9431-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Situational Influences on Condom Purchasing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, online purchases and self-service checkouts can pose difficulties through technological complexity or temporal issues (i.e., the product not being immediately accessible via the internet) (Miyazaki & Fernandez, 2001 ; Young et al, 2017 ). In addition, use of self-serving technologies and online retailers may raise legal, ethical, and safety issues, as when buying medications in pharmacies (Fung et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, online purchases and self-service checkouts can pose difficulties through technological complexity or temporal issues (i.e., the product not being immediately accessible via the internet) (Miyazaki & Fernandez, 2001 ; Young et al, 2017 ). In addition, use of self-serving technologies and online retailers may raise legal, ethical, and safety issues, as when buying medications in pharmacies (Fung et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies examine consumers' coping strategies to manage their identity while purchasing products, such as condoms (e.g., Brackett, 2004; Moore et al, 2006). Such strategies encompass problem‐focused, emotion‐focused and social support strategies (e.g., Moore et al, 2006), such as using anonymous channels (e.g., online purchases and self‐service checkouts) (e.g., Young et al, 2017) for buying embarrassing products. Studies propose scales of various personality traits, such as public and private self‐consciousness and embarrassbility (e.g., Fenigstein, 1979; Miller, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors such as fear of interaction with a store clerk, perceived witnesses, and anxiety surrounding judgment or stigmatization can affect levels of purchase embarrassment (Brackett ). Self‐checkout and online purchasing mediums have recently been explored as facilitating condom purchasing behaviors, however technological complexity and temporal issues (i.e., condoms not being immediately accessible via online purchase) continue to pose difficulties (Kinard, Capella, and Kinard ; Miyazaki and Fernandez ; Young et al ). Thus, investigating the effectiveness of alternative purchasing options that attempt to reduce consumer access barriers is paramount.…”
Section: Embarrassment and Condom Purchasing Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, women are more likely to utilize strategies, such as purchasing with friends, buying multiple unrelated products, and seeking out a clerk of the same gender, compared to males (Arndt and Ekebas-Turedi 2017;Brackett 2004). Product placement literature demonstrates condom placement in neutral pharmacy locations with increased privacy (e.g., near soap or other personal items) rather than aisles with additional embarrassing products may improve purchasing attitudes and reduce embarrassment (Gebhardt et al 2012;Young et al 2017). Various marketing and public health strategies have been implemented to reduce embarrassment and increase condom purchasing (de Visser 2005;Eastman-Mueller et al 2016;Kerr 1990;Ronis and LeBouthillier 2013), specifically self-checkout, vending machines, and mail-order programs; however, gender differences in purchasing persist (Leung and MacDonald 2018;Refinery 29 2017;Sixsmith et al 2006).…”
Section: Gender and Purchasingmentioning
confidence: 99%