2005
DOI: 10.1177/0013164404268672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Situational Judgment Tests and their Predictiveness of College Students’ Success: The Influence of Faking

Abstract: There is increasing interest in using situational judgment tests (SJTs) to supplement traditional student admission procedures. An important unexplored issue is whether students can intentionally distort or fake their responses on SJTs. This study examined the fakability of an SJT of college students' performance. Two hundred ninety-three psychology students completed a cognitive test, a personality measure, and an SJT. Only for the SJT, the students were assigned to either an honest or a fake condition. The s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
73
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, when SJT items had a stronger cognitive loading, they were less fakable (see also Peeters and Lievens, 2005). Second, more transparent items were more fakable.…”
Section: Fakabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First, when SJT items had a stronger cognitive loading, they were less fakable (see also Peeters and Lievens, 2005). Second, more transparent items were more fakable.…”
Section: Fakabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The presented situations try to evoke respondent's knowledge stored in his/her subconscious mind and make him/her apply the knowledge in the given situation (Sternberg & Wagner, 1992). SJTs were used to measure tacit knowledge of students (Peeters & Lievens, 2005), military leaders (Horvath, Sternberg, Forsythe, Sweeney, & Bullis, 1996), or managers (Colonia-Willner, 1999; R.K. Wagner & Sternberg, 1991), or nurses (Fox, 1997).…”
Section: Measuring the Knowledge On An Individual Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They discussed it in terms of the use of the ATDP scale with both rehabilitation and nonrehabilitation populations. Similarly, Peeters and Lievens (2005) had released that the scores of students in the fake condition were significantly higher than those of students in the honest condition. As well, Stein and Graham (1995) had administered the students under instructions to fake good, fake bad, or score honestly and reported significant (p < .001) difference on all validity scale scores of the three groups of respondents.…”
Section: Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%