Situational leadership theory: a test from a leader-follower congruence approach

Abstract

Purpose Empirical tests of Hersey and Blanchard’s situational leadership theory (SLT) have demonstrated that the assessment of follower competence and commitment, critical contextual features dictating optimal leadership style, poses several problems in testing the validity of this theory. As well, most previous studies have used leader rating as the only information source in making these assessments. The purpose of this paper is to use the degree of agreement between leader rating and follower self-rating to determine follower competence and commitment, and consequently an optimal leadership style. Design/methodology/approach Survey data collected from both supervisors and employees in business organizations in Norway were analyzed to test the predictions put forward in SLT. Findings The results show that SLT principles are supported when leader rating and follower self-rating are congruent. However, no support was obtained for Blanchard’s suggestion to apply followers’ self-ratings of competence and commitment in the case of discrepant ratings of follower development level. But data do support the contention that leader assessment would be a better basis for providing followers with appropriate direction and support. Originality/value So far SLT has been a very popular but as yet under-researched theory. An important contribution of the present study is by making SLT an evidence-based theory, as opposed to just being intuitively sound. As such, the authors think SLT in an updated “convergent” version should be applied in organizations and taught in leadership development programs.

Leaders—watch out for LMX differentiation: A multilevel model of leader-related antecedences and consequences of LMX differentiation

“…In addition, team members have different needs with regard to their desired level of leader exchange, as well as their tolerance for LMX differentiation. Thus, leaders may save resources while still maintaining high organizational performance by first determining how much exchange their individual team members’ desire, and then adapting their leadership behavior accordingly (Hersey et al, 2007; Thompson and Glasø, 2018).…”

The Bottleneck Metaphor of Leadership Culture: How Shared Understandings About Leadership Develop in Groups and Impede Diversity and Effectiveness of Leaders

“…Some of the ideas discussed in this paper can also pave the way for a more situational understanding of leadership emergence. Leadership researchers and practitioners, for a relatively long time, are aware that leadership effectiveness depends not only on the leaders but also on the conditions and settings that they lead in Fiedler (1966), Sims et al (2009), and Thompson and Glaso (2018). These include individual characteristics of their team members and team-level features (Swart-Opperman and April, 2018).…”

The Influence of Leadership Style on Managerial Performance of Village Governments with Motivation as Mediation

“…It affirms the four leadership scales: charisma, inspiration, individual consideration, and intellectual stimulation (Paracha et al, 2012). Motivation is the follower's interest in the task, and belief is the follower's sense of security or selfconfidence, the extent to which the follower believes he can work independently and perform well (Thompson & Glasø, 2018). The transformational leadership style had a positive relationship with motivation (Amalia et al, 2016;Ayoko et al, 2003;Tatengkeng & Andreani, 2019;Rosiana & Safitri, 2015;Alghazo & Meshal, 2016).…”