2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SIV/SHIV-Zika co-infection does not alter disease pathogenesis in adult non-pregnant rhesus macaque model

Abstract: Due to the large geographical overlap of populations exposed to Zika virus (ZIKV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), understanding the disease pathogenesis of co-infection is urgently needed. This warrants the development of an animal model for HIV-ZIKV co-infection. In this study, we used adult non-pregnant macaques that were chronically infected with simian immunodeficiency virus/chimeric simian human immunodeficiency virus (SIV/SHIV) and then inoculated with ZIKV. Plasma viral loads of both SIV/SHIV an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that the type I IFN responses elicited in SIV-infected RMs correlates with reduced ZIKV replication, that these coinfected animals mount inferior humoral responses to ZIKV, and that these animals have delayed ZIKV clearance. A recent study, using a small cohort of simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)-and SIV-infected RMs also found that ZIKV viremia was uncharacteristically low during coinfection; however, the authors concluded that SHIV/SIV infections did not dramatically influence the course of ZIKV infection (64). This small study of only 4 Asian macaques used historical controls and did not study immune responses to ZIKV; thus, the study is somewhat difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We find that the type I IFN responses elicited in SIV-infected RMs correlates with reduced ZIKV replication, that these coinfected animals mount inferior humoral responses to ZIKV, and that these animals have delayed ZIKV clearance. A recent study, using a small cohort of simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)-and SIV-infected RMs also found that ZIKV viremia was uncharacteristically low during coinfection; however, the authors concluded that SHIV/SIV infections did not dramatically influence the course of ZIKV infection (64). This small study of only 4 Asian macaques used historical controls and did not study immune responses to ZIKV; thus, the study is somewhat difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Immediately following concentration of cell culture supernatants UC purification of Zika virions [33] was carried out using allopolymer tubes (Denville Scientific) and OptiPrep density Gradient Media (Sigma). 15 mL of 12% OptiPrep in PBS (vol/vol) was overlaid on 10 mL of 35% OptiPrep (vol/vol) in 38.5 mL allopolymer tubes and 1.5 mL of concentrated viral supernatant was overlaid onto the 12% OptiPrep layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 33 different cytokines were measured in urine using the Luminex system (Table 1). All tested biomarkers have been successfully measured from plasma in prior studies of macaques (Bidokhti et al, 2018;Höglind et al, 2017;Joas et al, 2020;Olwenyi et al, 2022;Pantoja et al, 2017;Pérez-Guzmán et al, 2019;Singh et al, 2021;Woollard et al, 2018). The assay included evaluation of processed as described in Giavedoni (2005).…”
Section: Cytokine Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 33 different cytokines were measured in urine using the Luminex system (Table 1). All tested biomarkers have been successfully measured from plasma in prior studies of macaques (Bidokhti et al, 2018; Höglind et al, 2017; Joas et al, 2020; Olwenyi et al, 2022; Pantoja et al, 2017; Pérez‐Guzmán et al, 2019; Singh et al, 2021; Woollard et al, 2018). The assay included evaluation of the following analytes: B‐cell activating factor (BAFF); B lymphocyte chemoattractant (BLC, CXCL13); C‐reactive protein (CRP); eotaxin‐1 (CCL11); granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF); growth‐related oncogene‐a (GRO‐a, CXCL1); indoleamine‐pyrrole 2,3‐dioxygenase (IDO); interferon‐α (IFN‐α); IFN‐γ; interferon‐inducible T‐cell α chemoattractant (I‐TAC, CXCL11); interferon‐γ‐induced protein 10 kDa (IP‐10, CXCL10); interleukin‐1 beta (IL‐1β); IL‐1 receptor antagonist (IL‐1RA); IL‐4; IL‐8; IL‐10; IL‐12 p40 and p70; IL‐15; IL‐18; IL‐22; IL‐33 receptor (IL33R; ST2); lectin‐type oxidized low‐density lipoprotein receptor 1 (LOX‐1); macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF); monokine induced by γ interferon (MIG, CXCL9); macrophage inflammatory protein 1‐α (MIP‐1α, CCL3), MIP‐1β (CCL4); monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP‐1, CCL2); myeloperoxidase (MPO); perforin; regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted CCL5 (RANTES); tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α); soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L); soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM‐1); and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF‐A).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%