Purpose: The aim of this study is to present to the reader the advantages or disadvantages, if any, of nonviolence over methods requiring violence, taking into account the costs and benefits that may arise regarding the solution if methods dominated by nonviolence are used instead of violence.
Design/Methodology: The study was designed with a case study of the cost analysis of nonviolence.
Findings: As a result of the study; When one tries to solve a problem or problem with non-violence or violence, it is understood that non-violence appears to be a method that provides more income and prevents harm than violence. It is noteworthy that the revenues of one option are the costs of the other option. Accordingly, the superiority of nonviolence over violence is not one fold, but twofold in monetary terms.
Limitations: In the study, the cost analysis of nonviolence was limited to the framework of the sample application.
Originality/Value: Although the study has been studied extensively in other fields, examining it in terms of cost benefit analysis in the field of accounting constitutes the original value of the study as it can provide a significant gain to the literature.