Six year follow-up of a patient treated with mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis

Sukurica, Yusuf; Gürel, Hakan Gürcan; Mutlu, Necip

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2009.06.009

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, tooth extraction or interdental stripping, more commonly indicated for adult patients, may not provide adequate space in severe cases. [44], [45] Management of extreme transverse deficiencies was conventionally achieved via osteotomy and placement of bone grafts. Attempting to rectify the possible adverse events of bone grafting, Guerrero first used symphyseal distraction osteogenesis for mandibular widening and called it "rapid surgical mandibular expansion".…”

Section: Mandibular Wideningmentioning

confidence: 99%

10 Distraction Osteogenesis

2018

Pediatric Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Mandibular Wideningmentioning

confidence: 99%

10 Distraction Osteogenesis

2018

Pediatric Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The placement of the distractor requires a second surgery for its removal and quite obviously additional costs are involved for its purchase 10,30 . Even if these studies show that the risk is low, there is always the possibility of damaging the adjacent teeth.…”

Section: Advantages Of the Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%

Advantages of symphyseal distraction in the treatment of Brodie’s Syndrome

Sauvé

Wojcik²,

Ferri³

2013

J Dentofacial Anom Orthod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complications of mandibular distraction osteogenesis for developmental deformities: a systematic review of the literature

Verlinden

Vijfeijken

Tuinzing

et al. 2015

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic review of English and non-English articles on the complications of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) for patients with developmental deformities was performed, in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Search terms expressing distraction osteogenesis were used in 'AND' combination with search terms comprising 'mandible' and terms for complication, failure, and morbidity. A search using PubMed (National Library of Medicine, NCBI), EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register yielded 644 articles published between 1966 and mid October 2013. Clinical articles that reported complications related to MDO in developmental deformities were included. Two hundred and fifty articles were eligible and were screened in detail. A total of 32 articles reporting the cases of 565 patients were finally included. Patients underwent mandibular lengthening and transverse widening. A total of 211 complications were reported (37.4%); these were classified according to an index that indicates the clinical impact. Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) neurosensory disturbances, minor infection, device failure, anterior open bite, permanent dental damage, and skeletal relapse were most represented. Complications that resolved spontaneously (type I) were seen in 11.0%, medically or technically manageable complications, without hospitalization, were seen in 10.8% (type II), and permanent complications (type VI) were seen in 9.6%.

show abstract

Six year follow-up of a patient treated with mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis

Cited by 7 publications

References 32 publications

10 Distraction Osteogenesis

10 Distraction Osteogenesis

Advantages of symphyseal distraction in the treatment of Brodie’s Syndrome

Complications of mandibular distraction osteogenesis for developmental deformities: a systematic review of the literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About