2016
DOI: 10.1080/00173134.2016.1157206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Six years of observation of airborne and deposited pollen in central European Russia: first results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This trap located near the Hirst type trap where Urtica is widespread in the surrounding vegetation. A higher taxonomical diversity in the Tauber traps is due to its location at ground level, causing capture of pollen originated from local sources and not rising high in the air (Volkova et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This trap located near the Hirst type trap where Urtica is widespread in the surrounding vegetation. A higher taxonomical diversity in the Tauber traps is due to its location at ground level, causing capture of pollen originated from local sources and not rising high in the air (Volkova et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tauber traps are typically used to investigate pollen deposition patterns. The Tauber traps rely on gravity, thus the deposition into this trap types may not reflect true atmospheric composition but be biased toward the larger and heavier pollen types (Levetin et al 2000, Volkova et al 2016. Faegri & Iversen (1989) maintain that the deposition in the traps was only effective in the absence of wind and thus is not "natural" deposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This literature review, as well as the main data collection of pollen integrals, took into account both English and non-English literature found within the study region such as Norwegian, Serbian and Russian. This provided data of limited or no presence of airborne Ambrosia pollen from the following regions: Porto, Portugal (Ribeiro and Abreu, 2014), Funchal, Portugal (Camacho, 2015), Toledo, Spain (Garcia-Mozo et al, 2006;Perez-Badia et al, 2010) Badajoz, Spain (Gonzalo-Garijo et al, 2006), Salamanca, Spain (Rodríguez-de la Cruz et al, 2010), Nerja, Spain (Docampo et al, 2007), Moscow, Russia (Volkova et al, 2016), Mornag, Tunisia (Hadj Hamda et al, 2017), Nicosia, Cyprus (Gucel et al, 2013), Bodrum, Turkey (Tosunoglu and Bicakci, 2015), Konya, Turkey (Kizilpinar et al, 2012), Kastamonu, Turkey (Çeter et al, 2012), Denizli, Turkey (Güvensen et al, 2013), Van, Turkey (Bicakci et al, 2017), Hatay, Turkey (Tosunoglu et al, 2018), Perm, Russia (Novoselova and Minaeva, 2015), 12 sites from Norway (e.g. Bicakci et al, 2017;Tosunoglu et al, 2018) Finland (Manninen et al, 2014) and 5 sites from central/northern Russia that documented no Ambrosia pollen deposition from the air (Nosova et al, 2015).…”
Section: Pollen Data and Calculation Of Infestation Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A group of palynologists analyzed long-term data on birch pollination in the Moscow region and identified the main meteorological factors affecting the concentration of pollen during its season [154]. A comparative study of urban and suburban pollen spectra showed that pollen monitoring station data collected in large cities can be extrapolated to the surrounding countryside [155].…”
Section: Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%