2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size analysis of nanoscale order in amorphous materials by variable-resolution fluctuation electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these experiments, qualitative differences in FEM variance were observed and attributed to fundamental physical phenomena such as differences in film deposition condition [23], the existence and thermal ripening of subcritical nuclei that precede crystallisation [29,30], and the effect of alloying on crystallisation kinetics [33]. Quantitative FEM analysis has thus far proven challenging, but with recent developments such as variable resolution FEM, information about the extent of the nanometre-scale ordering can be extracted [26,34]. Nevertheless, a number of recent studies have been successful in relating the scattering covariance and angular correlations in FEM data to structural information [13,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these experiments, qualitative differences in FEM variance were observed and attributed to fundamental physical phenomena such as differences in film deposition condition [23], the existence and thermal ripening of subcritical nuclei that precede crystallisation [29,30], and the effect of alloying on crystallisation kinetics [33]. Quantitative FEM analysis has thus far proven challenging, but with recent developments such as variable resolution FEM, information about the extent of the nanometre-scale ordering can be extracted [26,34]. Nevertheless, a number of recent studies have been successful in relating the scattering covariance and angular correlations in FEM data to structural information [13,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been suggested. Bogle et al [4] observed a correlation between the relative heights of the first and second variance peak, at least for Si, but this depends also on the probe size. Yi et al [16] proposed detailed fitting of peak heights and probe size, based on a reasonably sophisticated dispersed crystal model of a composite, but this appears vulnerable to details of the structure (e.g.…”
Section: ) Volume Fraction Of Ordered Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the "ansatz" model proposed by Gibson et al [3], several authors have had consistent results in measuring the correlation length from the dependence of the normalized intensity variance on the probe size (also known as "variable resolution microscopy") e.g. Bogle et al [4]. There has been controversy about the volume fraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most important difference is that the resolution in the nanodiffraction mode can easily be changed by modifying the diameter of the nanoprobe (the variable resolution mode), whereas the resolution in the dark-field mode is fixed by the size of the objective aperture. [16] Data obtained at multiple resolutions give explicit information about the length scale of structural order, as discussed in Section 4. Another difference is that, although the two modes of FTEM give the same shape of V(k), the nanodiffraction mode gives higher magnitude of variance.…”
Section: Nanodiffraction and Variable Resolution Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%