“…Figure 2 B provides more details regarding the size distribution data, fitting, and data quality at 500, 1500, 2500 and 3500 rpm. At the lowest stirring rate, 500 rpm ( Figure 2 B, panel 1), due to agglomeration and heterogenous distribution, the residual and weighted residual values reached >3%, above the recommended threshold of 1–2% [ 25 , 26 ], suggesting unacceptable data quality and unrealistically large particle sizes (e.g., Dv90 > 2500 µm) that were poorly aligned with the light scattering patterns and models. At 1500, 2500, and 3500 rpm ( Figure 2 B, panels 2–4), the distribution curves became smooth and continuous, with the gradual disappearance of the dominant artifact peak (most frequently occurring size > 1000 µm) observed at 500 rpm.…”