Kin selection theory predicts that, where kin discrimination is possible, animals should typically act more favorably toward closer genetic relatives and direct aggression toward less closely related individuals. Contrary to this prediction, we present data from an 18-y study of wild banded mongooses, Mungos mungo, showing that females that are more closely related to dominant individuals are specifically targeted for forcible eviction from the group, often suffering severe injury, and sometimes death, as a result. This pattern cannot be explained by inbreeding avoidance or as a response to more intense local competition among kin. Instead, we use game theory to show that such negative kin discrimination can be explained by selection for unrelated targets to invest more effort in resisting eviction. Consistent with our model, negative kin discrimination is restricted to eviction attempts of older females capable of resistance; dominants exhibit no kin discrimination when attempting to evict younger females, nor do they discriminate between more closely or less closely related young when carrying out infanticidal attacks on vulnerable infants who cannot defend themselves. We suggest that in contexts where recipients of selfish acts are capable of resistance, the usual prediction of positive kin discrimination can be reversed. Kin selection theory, as an explanation for social behavior, can benefit from much greater exploration of sequential social interactions.K in selection theory aims to understand how selection acts on social traits, such as altruism and selfishness, that affect the fitness of social partners and local group members (1, 2). The theory predicts that where animals can discriminate between more closely and less closely related individuals within their social group, they will preferentially direct altruism toward closer genetic relatives and aggression toward less closely related targets (1-3). Instances of such positive kin discrimination are taxonomically numerous and widespread (4), whereas reported examples of negative kin discrimination are rare (5, 6).Contrary to the predictions of traditional kin selection theory, we show below that banded mongooses exercise negative kin discrimination during attempts at eviction and that this result is not readily explained by inbreeding avoidance or local kin competition. However, a simple and very general sequential game model of selfish behavior that takes into account the possibility of active resistance on the part of recipients does provide a potential explanation for negative kin discrimination. We first describe the model and then test predictions of the model using our data.
Explaining Negative Kin Discrimination: A ModelConsider the interaction between two individuals, the first of whom (player 1) may perform a selfish act at the other's expense, such as stealing a food item, killing offspring, or, in the case with which we are concerned, evicting the other from the territory or group. We suppose that this act entails some fitness cost to the act...