Size and performance in family managed firms: surviving first generation

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to examine how the familiar character of the firm affects its size and performance. Specifically, if the confluence of business and family dimensions affects their chances of survival. Design/methodology/approach -With data from 581 family, small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), the possible negative relationship between family, on the one hand, and size and performance, on the other hand is analyzed. First, the authors made a cluster analysis which distinguishes four groups attending the source of management, family next to external, and the generation, first against the rest. In addition, the authors contrast the existence of non-linear adjustment through quadratic regressions.Findings -Cluster analysis shows that the firms with family management in first generation are the ones with smaller size and worse performance. Regression analysis contrasts the negative relationship, but exclusively linear in nature. For all companies, regardless of the familiar character, the study confirms a negative relation of quadratic character. This paper clarifies the theories about the life cycle, so that they may be applicable to the family business. The companies must overcome the early stages, where the entrepreneurial impulse is key, to give way to more professionalized structures. Originality/value -There are two fundamental contributions of this study. The first relates to the use of quadratic functions to model the relationship between family management and size and performance. The second relates to the life cycle of the family business and the role played by the family management; for that end the authors compare companies of family management in first generation with other companies to see to what extent the decision to retain a smaller size to preserve the family character is intentional.

Is small and medium-sized beautiful? The structure and evolution of family SMEs research

“…The author also suggests that more resources do not necessarily imply better performances. Luis Meroño Cerdan and José Carrasco Hernández (Luis Meroño Cerdan and José Carrasco Hernández, 2013) study if the integration between family dimension and business dimension of the firm affects its size and performance. They adopt cluster analysis and show that the family businesses which involve the first-generation family members in management present worse performance, confirming a negative relationship between family behaviour of the firm and firm performance.…”

Socioemotional wealth (SEW) as the driver of business performance in family businesses in Bosnia and Herzegovina: the mediating role of transformational leadership

“…Family businesses represent the most common business form on a global scale (Memili et al ., 2015; Labelle et al ., 2015), and very commonly, family members manage the family business (Qureshi et al ., 2021). They are among the most crucial factors that determine the economic growth of a country (Rachmawati et al ., 2020) as well as the key contributors to the generation of wealth and job creation (Merono-Cardan and Carrasco-Hernandez, 2013). Considering their immense importance for the economy, it is not surprising that researchers are devoting significant efforts to investigate the performance of family businesses and factors that are related to it (e.g.…”

The preferred usage of equity and debt financing in family businesses: evidence from Czech Republic

“…Globally, they represent a socially significant phenomenon and contribute significantly to the creation of GDP (Prasetyo, 2016; Krošláková, 2013). They operate in all commercial industries, take various legal forms and organizational structures, and have a range of different sizes -from micro, small and medium-sized enterprises to large, multinational, global corporations traded on exchanges (Cerdan & Hernandez, 2013).…”