2012
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2408-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-Based Clinical Response Evaluation is Insufficient to Assess Clinical Response of Sarcomas Treated with Isolated Limb Perfusion with TNF-α and Melphalan

Abstract: Size-based clinical response evaluation is insufficient to assess clinical response in TM-ILP-treated sarcomas. The size changes of tumors after therapy reflect the type of regression rather than the extent of destruction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
15
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
15
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the largest studies have adjusted these clinical data downward to an overall response rate of approximately 70% and a complete response rate of 20% [36]. Interestingly, clinical and pathological response evaluations have often differed substantially, which we have recently demonstrated to be the result of an insufficiency in size-based clinical response criteria that would indicate actual tumor responses (measured by a pathological investigation as the gold standard) [37]. The SS cohort exhibited a mean pathological response rate that was approximately identical to that of the STS −SS in this cohort of resected STS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the largest studies have adjusted these clinical data downward to an overall response rate of approximately 70% and a complete response rate of 20% [36]. Interestingly, clinical and pathological response evaluations have often differed substantially, which we have recently demonstrated to be the result of an insufficiency in size-based clinical response criteria that would indicate actual tumor responses (measured by a pathological investigation as the gold standard) [37]. The SS cohort exhibited a mean pathological response rate that was approximately identical to that of the STS −SS in this cohort of resected STS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are similar to those reported by other studies ( de Wilt et al , 2000 ; Hoving et al , 2006 ). In contrast, soft tissue sarcomas have been reported to not shrink significantly after pre-treatment with TM-ILP or chemotherapy ( Stacchiotti et al , 2009 ; Grabellus et al , 2012b ). In agreement with these findings, despite the positive response to TM-ILP, there was still a sufficiently significant residual tumour in all patients of the present study (between 20 and 100% of the original size) to allow measurement by O2C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, therapy response is routinely monitored by changes in tumor size according to RECIST (10). However, exclusive size-based criteria have been shown insufficient for reliable response evaluation of neoadjuvant treatment effects of STS (11,12). Therefore, Stacchiotti et al introduced the MR-adapted Choi criteria, comprising modified size criteria for tumor response with, in addition, quantification of therapy-related changes in contrast-enhancing tumor parts (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%