2004
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arh024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-based variation in antipredator behavior within a snake (Agkistrodon piscivorus) population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The antipredator behavioural repertoire is determined by various factors. These include morphological characteristics (Mc Lean and Godin 1989;Losos et al 2002;Mima et al 2003) and size and age of the prey individual (Krause et al 1998;Irschick 2000;Shine et al 2000;Roth and Johnson 2004;Creer 2005;Husak 2006;Wohlfahrt et al 2007;Landová et al 2013). Also, many environmental features affect antipredator behaviour such as the intensity of threatening stimuli (Puttlitz et al 1999;Polo-Cavia et al 2008;Ibáñez et al 2014) and availability and distance of refuges (Mc Lean and Godin 1989;Krause et al 1998;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The antipredator behavioural repertoire is determined by various factors. These include morphological characteristics (Mc Lean and Godin 1989;Losos et al 2002;Mima et al 2003) and size and age of the prey individual (Krause et al 1998;Irschick 2000;Shine et al 2000;Roth and Johnson 2004;Creer 2005;Husak 2006;Wohlfahrt et al 2007;Landová et al 2013). Also, many environmental features affect antipredator behaviour such as the intensity of threatening stimuli (Puttlitz et al 1999;Polo-Cavia et al 2008;Ibáñez et al 2014) and availability and distance of refuges (Mc Lean and Godin 1989;Krause et al 1998;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontogenetic changes in antipredator behaviour are pronounced in precocial species (Krause et al 1998;Irschick 2000;Shine et al 2000;Roth and Johnson 2004;Creer 2005;Husak 2006;Landová et al 2013), in which the ability to avoid predation by themselves is under strong selective pressure (Carrier 1996). Studies of ontogenetic changes in natural populations are limited due to mere age assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An animal’s perception of risk can be influenced by its susceptibility to predation based on body size (Roth and Johnson 2004; Urban 2007), as well as previous interactions with predators. Prior experience with predators has been shown to influence the perception of risk in a variety of taxa, including mammals (Owings et al 2001), fish (Kelley and Magurran 2003; Walling et al 2004), and lizards (Labra and Leonard 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…predator type, habitat characteristics). Among them ontogeny is a major factor that can influence the level of ecological performance within natural populations as it affects a broad range of ecological, physiological and behavioural characteristics (see Roth and Johnson, 2004). However, studies investigating changes in the performance of animal function with ontogeny are restricted to relatively few groups of organisms, mainly vertebrates, and few traits, such as locomotor and feeding systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%