2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-1919-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size characterization of airborne SiO2 nanoparticles with on-line and off-line measurement techniques: an interlaboratory comparison study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For reference gold nanoparticles below 100 nm systematic deviations between the three sizing methods AFM, SMPS and TSEM were observed (see Figure 3). Similar deviations have been reported in the literature [6,7] and could not be resolved in the frame of the project. The JRP-Consortium therefore released the following recommendation on how to calibrate DMAs:…”
Section: Si-traceable Electric Mobility Diametersupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For reference gold nanoparticles below 100 nm systematic deviations between the three sizing methods AFM, SMPS and TSEM were observed (see Figure 3). Similar deviations have been reported in the literature [6,7] and could not be resolved in the frame of the project. The JRP-Consortium therefore released the following recommendation on how to calibrate DMAs:…”
Section: Si-traceable Electric Mobility Diametersupporting
confidence: 75%
“…8; Motzkus et al, 2013). The metrological capabilities provided by this unique methodical approach are convincing, mainly consisting of accurate determination of NP size and size distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, it was demonstrated that calibration with appropriate standards is necessary to achieve accurate quantification and a study of results comparability with IN revealed important variability depending on the calibration material chosen [90]. As for diameter measurement accuracy, ES-DMA systems are generally calibrated with CRMs of inorganic nanoparticles and provide highly precise measurements [90,92]. It is however important to note that the diameters measured with ES-DMA are electrical mobility diameters, i.e.…”
Section: Electrospray Differential Mobility Analysis (Es-dma)mentioning
confidence: 99%