2010
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-dependent misclassification of masquerading prey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thought experiment here is that an animal that relies on crypsis must be on the right background, but a masquerading animal could be completely visible on a mismatching background, but still misclassified by a predator as ‘not food’. It is this difference that inspired Skelhorn and colleagues to perform a series of experiments where prior experience of what might or might not be food was manipulated (Skelhorn & Ruxton, , ; Skelhorn et al ., ,b). It may appear surprising that it took 120 years, from Poulton's illustrations of twig‐mimicking caterpillars, for the first systematic experiments on the basis of masquerade to be performed, but this is probably because the benefit for a caterpillar of looking like a twig seems self‐evident (‘A stick is a stick and not worth eating’; Robinson, ).…”
Section: Peeling the Onionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thought experiment here is that an animal that relies on crypsis must be on the right background, but a masquerading animal could be completely visible on a mismatching background, but still misclassified by a predator as ‘not food’. It is this difference that inspired Skelhorn and colleagues to perform a series of experiments where prior experience of what might or might not be food was manipulated (Skelhorn & Ruxton, , ; Skelhorn et al ., ,b). It may appear surprising that it took 120 years, from Poulton's illustrations of twig‐mimicking caterpillars, for the first systematic experiments on the basis of masquerade to be performed, but this is probably because the benefit for a caterpillar of looking like a twig seems self‐evident (‘A stick is a stick and not worth eating’; Robinson, ).…”
Section: Peeling the Onionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And studies of predator cognition provide strong support for these assumptions. Predators generalize their learned avoidance of inedible objects sufficiently widely to be fooled by imperfect masqueraders that possess qualities that predators could use to differentiate them from their inedible models [33]. Importantly, however, imperfect masqueraders do not fool predators to the same extent as individuals that more accurately resemble inedible models [33].…”
Section: Predator Cognition and The Evolution Of Masqueradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The defensive strategy known as masquerade, or camouflage without crypsis, has received very little scientific attention in animals (e.g. Allen & Cooper, ; Ruxton, Sherratt & Speed, ; Skelhorn, Rowland & Ruxton, ; Skelhorn et al ., 2010b, c), and concerning plants practically none. Masquerade by animals is a situation when a prey resembles inedible objects such as leaves, twigs, stones or bird‐droppings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%