2006
DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2006.9989125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size‐dependent reproductive success in Gambian men: Does height or weight matter more?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These latter two populations are very lean compared with Western populations, as is this Gambian population, and these results raise the possibility that testosterone may show non-linear relationships with BMI or fat mass, with both men of low and high weight having lower testosterone than those of moderate weight or fat mass. These testosterone results also fit with a previous study in this population demonstrating that BMI is positively associated with both adult mortality and reproductive success (number of marriages, number of children and number of surviving children), whereas height was correlated with neither (Sear 2006).…”
Section: Testosterone Age Health and Wealthsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These latter two populations are very lean compared with Western populations, as is this Gambian population, and these results raise the possibility that testosterone may show non-linear relationships with BMI or fat mass, with both men of low and high weight having lower testosterone than those of moderate weight or fat mass. These testosterone results also fit with a previous study in this population demonstrating that BMI is positively associated with both adult mortality and reproductive success (number of marriages, number of children and number of surviving children), whereas height was correlated with neither (Sear 2006).…”
Section: Testosterone Age Health and Wealthsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The mean height of men was 170.9cm (standard deviation 6.6) and the mean BMI was 21.7 (standard deviation 3.7). This compares to a mean height of 168cm and mean BMI 20.4 for adult men in this population between 1950-1980 (Sear 2006), suggesting recent modest improvements in general health. Tricep skinfolds were lowest in unmarried men and highest in polygynously married men.…”
Section: Descriptive Summary By Marital and Fatherhood Statusmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Setting B = F w, where F is fertility and w is the proportion of married women 1 , and assuming that F and D are constant in this interval of heights [10], we conclude that w depends on x. This conclusion is in agreement with statistical data that the probability of marriage and having children depends on height [10], [30], [32]. Even a weak dependence of the proportion of married women on height can change the sign of the coefficient B − D − λ, which is necessary for the existence of the bell shape distributions.…”
Section: Models Of Reproductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For example, in Namibia, taller men of the !Kung tend to have more surviving offspring than their shorter counterparts (Kirchengast, 2000); however, studies of rural and urban Namibian males around Rundu found that taller males in rural areas have more offspring but that taller males from urban areas have fewer offspring (Kirchengast & Winkler, 1995). Questions about the universality of male height preferences have been raised in light of findings that taller men were not found to have higher reproductive success in Gambia (Sear, 2006a). In the light of the findings of this article it is worth noting that GII values for Gambia were excessively high (0.742), indicating that females suffer from extreme inequality and impaired mate selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%