2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size dependent skin penetration of nanoparticles in murine and porcine dermatitis models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three structures with <75 nm in size (TH21, TH37, 6H714) showed considerable skin penetration, in which small tetrahedron TH37 (44 nm) and TH21 (17 nm) reached deeply to ~350–400 µm beneath skin surface in mice. This result aligns well with reported size-dependency on carrier skin penetrative ability 30 . However, the three distinct-shaped structures with similar size (~180 nm; TH337, R13730, and T14498) all showed minimal skin penetration (~50–75 µm from the skin surface).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Three structures with <75 nm in size (TH21, TH37, 6H714) showed considerable skin penetration, in which small tetrahedron TH37 (44 nm) and TH21 (17 nm) reached deeply to ~350–400 µm beneath skin surface in mice. This result aligns well with reported size-dependency on carrier skin penetrative ability 30 . However, the three distinct-shaped structures with similar size (~180 nm; TH337, R13730, and T14498) all showed minimal skin penetration (~50–75 µm from the skin surface).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Smaller sizes have been reported by introducing a sonication step during PEG conjugation reaction [ 25 ]. It is relevant to notice that nano-sized particles have been reported to result in improved skin permeation and skin retention, improving treatment outcomes of inflammatory skin diseases [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles (Size = 68 ± 7 nm, Zeta potential = 30 ± 2) presented greater permeation of AmB than AmB-CH-Dex nanoparticles (Size = 168 ± 7 nm, Zeta potential = −15.5 ± 2). Similarly, Try et al (2016) reported that smaller poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles (70 nm) penetrated healthy male Swiss mice skin further than larger particles (300 nm) [ 70 ]. Another explanation of the greater penetration is that the positive surface charge of AmB-CH-TPP nanoparticles could interact with negative charges in the skin promoting close interaction and an occlusive barrier that could cause hydration, which would facilitate nanoparticle permeation through the skin [ 71 , 72 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%