2019
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpy150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-dependent variation in leaf functional traits and nitrogen allocation trade-offs in Robinia pseudoacacia and Cornus controversa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies conducted in forest dynamic plots (Anderson-Teixeira et al, 2015) usually define seedlings as individuals with height > 10 or 20 cm and dbh < 1 cm that include a wide range of sizes. The influence of plant size on leaf traits is supported by recent findings (Dayrell et al, 2018;Forrestel et al, 2015;Martin & Thomas, 2013;Mason et al, 2013;Park et al, 2019). Second, micro-environmental heterogeneity in our plot, such as spatial variation in light availability, can also drive leaf trait variation among individuals (Rozendaal et al, 2006).…”
Section: Intraspecific Variation In Seedling Lamina and Petiole Traitssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Studies conducted in forest dynamic plots (Anderson-Teixeira et al, 2015) usually define seedlings as individuals with height > 10 or 20 cm and dbh < 1 cm that include a wide range of sizes. The influence of plant size on leaf traits is supported by recent findings (Dayrell et al, 2018;Forrestel et al, 2015;Martin & Thomas, 2013;Mason et al, 2013;Park et al, 2019). Second, micro-environmental heterogeneity in our plot, such as spatial variation in light availability, can also drive leaf trait variation among individuals (Rozendaal et al, 2006).…”
Section: Intraspecific Variation In Seedling Lamina and Petiole Traitssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Our finding of the pattern of SLA declining with increasing plant size of C . dunniana , agrees with this expectation and is in line with the pattern widely reported from forests in other parts of the world (e.g., Kenzo et al, 2015 ; Martin & Thomas, 2013 ; Park et al, 2019 ; Thomas & Winner, 2002 ). However, the leaf area of C .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the forest, as a plant increases in size, it generally faces increasingly higher irradiance and hydraulic resistance at higher forest strata (Rozendaal et al, 2006 ; Thomas & Bazzaz, 1999 ), as a result, leaf traits usually show corresponding shifts toward more conservative resource‐use strategy (e.g., Cavaleri et al, 2010 ; Dayrell et al, 2018 ; He & Yan, 2018 ; Ishida et al, 2005 ). Larger conspecific individuals usually have smaller sized leaves (Koch et al, 2004 ), smaller specific leaf area (SLA) (Kenzo et al, 2015 ; Thomas & Winner, 2002 ), as well as higher leaf dry‐matter content (LDMC) (Park et al, 2019 ). These size‐dependent trait shifts are interpreted as plant adopting an increasingly more conservative light and water‐use strategies in response to high light and drought stress, through acclimation and plasticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass‐based leaf N content (N mass ) was positively related to tree size in evergreen trees (He & Yan, ; Kenzo et al, ) and in a deciduous tree (Sendall & Reich, ), whereas no significant correlation was found in two evergreen conifers (Niinemets, ). The size dependence of N mass was different between two tropical tree species (Martin & Thomas, ) and between two deciduous tree species (Park et al, ). The correlation between leaf longevity and plant size was negative in Chinese pine ( P. tabulaeformis Carr.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%