2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017jc013193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Distribution and Dispersion of Droplets Generated by Impingement of Breaking Waves on Oil Slicks

Abstract: This laboratory experimental study investigates the temporal evolution of the size distribution of subsurface oil droplets generated as breaking waves entrain oil slicks. The measurements are performed for varying wave energy, as well as large variations in oil viscosity and oil‐water interfacial tension, the latter achieved by premixing the oil with dispersant. In situ measurements using digital inline holography at two magnifications are applied for measuring the droplet sizes and Particle Image Velocimetry … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
111
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(111 reference statements)
9
111
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Li, Spaulding, et al (2017), similar in concept to that of Johansen et al (2015) and the work by Zeinstra-Helfrich et al (2017). Recently, C. Li, Miller, et al (2017) reported experimental results of oil dispersion due to a plunging breaker of a solitary wave without and with dispersant. Their results indicated that in the absence of dispersant, the DS model holds well for entrained droplets whose diameters are smaller than 70 μm but that it overestimates the number of submerged larger diameter droplets.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Li, Spaulding, et al (2017), similar in concept to that of Johansen et al (2015) and the work by Zeinstra-Helfrich et al (2017). Recently, C. Li, Miller, et al (2017) reported experimental results of oil dispersion due to a plunging breaker of a solitary wave without and with dispersant. Their results indicated that in the absence of dispersant, the DS model holds well for entrained droplets whose diameters are smaller than 70 μm but that it overestimates the number of submerged larger diameter droplets.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…As shown by Li et al (2017), the time evolution of the droplet size distribution at the measurement location could be represented well by a simple model that includes the effects of turbulent diffusion and droplet buoyancy only. Since the dissipation rate was quite low at the measurement location, Li et al (2017) neglected the effect of droplet breakup in their model. Consequently, for the case of crude oil with dispersants, the model under-predicted the number of smaller size droplets generated.…”
Section: Model For Breakup Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Weber number (W e = 2ρ(ǫd) 2/3 d/σ) based on the droplet diameter for the case with dispersants is approximately W e = 3, confirming that the effects of droplet breakup are important. Our goal is to expand the model of Li et al (2017) by including breakup and select a value of K * that can achieve improved agreement with their experimental data.…”
Section: Model For Breakup Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the difficulty of reproducing air entrainment from breaking waves in small-scale laboratory systems, researchers have used different experimental setups to generate subsurface bubbles including porous glass tubes (Mårtensson et al, 2003;Scott, 1975), overturning buckets (Carey et al, 1993;Haines & Johnson, 1995), continuous jets (May et al, 2016;Salter et al, 2014), intermittent water sheets (Stokes et al, 2013(Stokes et al, , 2016, and wave channels (Deane & Stokes, 2002;Li et al, 2017;Loewen et al, 1996). The validity of such setups to faithfully reproduce air-water interactions from breaking waves depends on their ability to replicate the in situ bubbles and aerosols size distributions (Fuentes et al, 2010;Stokes et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%