Size Distribution and Fractal Characteristics of Coal Pores through Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Cryoporometry

Abstract

Characterization of the coal pore structure plays a critical role in the adsorption and flow of coalbed methane (CBM) during CBM exploitation. The accuracy of conventional techniques is relatively low, especially for micropores.Nuclear magnetic resonance cryoporometry (NMRC), as a new technique that is used to detect the pore structure of porous media, has been applied to many fields. However, it is rarely used for CBM reservoirs. In this study, the pore size distribution (PSD) and fractal characteristics of semianthracites and anthracites are investigated through NMRC, routine NMR and low-temperature nitrogen adsorption methods. The results show that the PSD obtained from NMRC is divided into three types, which are mainly affected by the metamorphic degree of the selected coals (coal rank). Type I PSD from NMRC shares a high consistency with that yielded by NMR. The comparison between PSD from NMRC and NMR shows that the NMR method yields a higher pore volume for adsorption pores than that of NMRC due to the presence of skeleton information and paramagnetic impurities. The fractal result of coal pores from NMRC indicates that the transition pores and mesopores are more complex than the micropores. Moreover, the results from NMRC represent a more accurate pore Page 1 of 45 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Energy & Fuels 2 structure for the same coal sample compared with NMR. The relationships between pore volume, permeability, Langmuir volume and pore fractals has also been established, which proves that, as a new method, NMRC is of great significance in characterizing the petrophysical properties of CBM reservoirs.

Methane adsorption constrained by pore structure in high‐rank coals using FESEM, CO2 adsorption, and NMRC techniques

“… R o,m represents maximum vitrinite reflectance under oil immersion(data from ref); D‐A and DFT means the data calculated based on Dubinin‐Astakhov and Density Functional Theory model, respectively. …”

“…In this paper, the fractal characteristics were investigated based on NMRC to discuss the heterogeneity of pore structure. Corresponding to the Gibbs‐Thomson thermodynamic equation (Equation ), fractal dimensions can be obtained to determine the pore volume complexity in NMRC …”

“…The proximate analysis indicated that the moisture, ash, volatile material, and fixed carbon content, respectively, vary from 0.88 to 1.63%, 8.78 to 13.41%, 12.43 to 18.38%, and from 70.09 to 74.31%. (Data from ref )…”

“…Moreover, the specific surface area and pore volume from CO 2 adsorption is higher than those from low‐temperature nitrogen adsorption . The PSD measured by NMRC ranges from 1 to 500 nm, and the accuracy of the results is higher than that of low‐temperature nitrogen adsorption, especially for micropores . (2) The major research section is seepage pore and fracture, such as mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP).…”

“…18 The PSD measured by NMRC ranges from 1 to 500 nm, and the accuracy of the results is higher than that of low-temperature nitrogen adsorption, especially for micropores. 21,22 (2) The major research section is seepage pore and fracture, such as mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Since the pores in CBM reservoirs have strong compressibility, 23 the results of adsorption pores obtained by this means are usually inaccurate.…”