2008
DOI: 10.1134/s0020168508100154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size distribution function of magnetite nanoparticles in disperse systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R H and PDI of magnetic nanoparticles was measured 16.6 nm and 0.234 by DLS. Additionally, the mean particle diameter ( d p ) and standard deviation (σ g ) was calculated as 9.57 nm and 2.25, respectively, by fitting log‐normal distribution function18 from HRTEM. It is worth noting that the value for the particle diameter obtained from electron microscopy means the particle core size, whereas the size detected using DLS system refers to a hydrodynamic diameter of particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R H and PDI of magnetic nanoparticles was measured 16.6 nm and 0.234 by DLS. Additionally, the mean particle diameter ( d p ) and standard deviation (σ g ) was calculated as 9.57 nm and 2.25, respectively, by fitting log‐normal distribution function18 from HRTEM. It is worth noting that the value for the particle diameter obtained from electron microscopy means the particle core size, whereas the size detected using DLS system refers to a hydrodynamic diameter of particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of this function is justified by experimental observations (as reviewed by Granqvist & Buhrman, 1976) and several theoretical models developed for single-process-driven NP syntheses (Smoluchowsky, 1917;Sö derlund et al, 1998;Kiss et al, 1999, and references therein;Ali-zade, 2008).…”
Section: The Dfa Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, solids without vacancies are not so prone to stabilize Au species below 1 nm by reduction of supported Au cations. Indeed, a statistical analysis on the size of Au particles over 30 different Au-supported solids described in the literature [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] ( Figure S10) shows that, within the resolution limit of conventional HR-TEM instruments, the probability of having sub-nanometric Au entities after hydrogenation of Au atoms supported on a solid is <5%, and this value only gets significant for some transition metal oxides. This statistical analysis was carried out following normal and lognormal distributions, the most accepted and suitable statistical approaches to describe the formation of metal particles from monoatomic precursors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%