2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-014-2056-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effect of confined concrete subjected to axial compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other phenomena should also be considered for specific analyses, for instance, effects related to low cycle fatigue, 22 to size, 23 to temperature 9 and shape effects in compression.…”
Section: Structural Concrete Strength: Background and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other phenomena should also be considered for specific analyses, for instance, effects related to low cycle fatigue, 22 to size, 23 to temperature 9 and shape effects in compression.…”
Section: Structural Concrete Strength: Background and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniaxial compression strength of waste-soil is the most important factor in determining the dump stability, so an accurate measurement of uniaxial compressive strength of waste-soil sample is essential [6,7]. However, because of the friction between the bearing plate and waste-soil sample in the uniaxial compression experiment, the uneven stress distribution, triaxial compression region, and tensile region will arise locally [8,9]. The above phenomena will have a bad effect on the accurate measurement of waste-soil sample parameters and the study of the failure mechanism [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous test efforts have been carried out to explore the size effect in RC columns. Many studies have concentrated on the influencing factors on the size effect of RC columns, involving the slenderness ratio (Bažant and Kwon, 1994; Şener et al., 1999, 2004), the strength grade of concrete (Koç and Şener, 2009; Li et al., 2016), the transversal confinement (e.g., the stirrup-confined (Němeček et al., 2005; Li et al., 2014; Li et al., 2016), fiber-confined (Elsanadedy et al., 2012; Liang et al., 2012; Masia et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2016), steel-tube confined (Sakino et al., 2004; Yamamoto et al., 2002)), as well as the loading pattern (Bažant and Kwon, 1994; Guo and Bažant, 2007). Moreover, finite element analyses were also performed, e.g., in the publications (Bažant and Jirasek, 2002; Majewski et al., 2008; Pijaudier-Cabot et al., 2004; van Mier and van Vliet, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%