2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effect of thermal shock crack patterns in ceramics and numerical predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our theoretical model predicts constant crack spacing for the sample with different thickness subject to the same temperature change, without any assumption of material properties. This conclusion has more applicability and is also supported by the experimental and numerical studies of another research group [45]. Figure 5a, b shows the crack patterns of alumina after thermal shock at the temperature difference | Φ| = 400 K and | Φ| = 900 K, and we can find a hierarchical crack pattern in the latter situation.…”
Section: The Critical Temperature Difference and Crack Spacing In Thesupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, our theoretical model predicts constant crack spacing for the sample with different thickness subject to the same temperature change, without any assumption of material properties. This conclusion has more applicability and is also supported by the experimental and numerical studies of another research group [45]. Figure 5a, b shows the crack patterns of alumina after thermal shock at the temperature difference | Φ| = 400 K and | Φ| = 900 K, and we can find a hierarchical crack pattern in the latter situation.…”
Section: The Critical Temperature Difference and Crack Spacing In Thesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We notice that in some existing literature [41,45], nonconstant crack spacing is observed and modeled. This may be attributed to the material properties sensitive to temperature.…”
Section: The Critical Temperature Difference and Crack Spacing In Thementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Inspired by Bahr's research works, in the last decade, many researchers studied crack patterns after thermal shocks, in order to reveal mechanisms between residual strength and crack characteristics . For thin ceramic specimens, Shao conducted thermal shock testing in the temperature range higher than the critical thermal shock temperature difference (Δ T c ) and showed that the depth of long crack was gradually increased in regime III, which supported the standpoint of Davidge and Bahr, although Hasselman had opposite results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Jiang utilized a combination of experimental evidence and finite element method, based on the minimum potential energy principle, to assess the mechanism of formation of thermal shock crack patterns in ceramics. By using the similar method, Wu devoted to the size effect and Liu employed thin circular ceramic specimens in thermal shock experiments. In the research of Jiang, Wu and Liu, they do not only reproduce the evolution of crack patterns with regular periodic and hierarchical characteristics during the thermal shock process but also expect to reveal the mechanism forming this kind of patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He found that the wall thickness has a significant effect on ∆T c , compared to the relatively weak effects of tube diameter and length. Wu et al [2015] examined the size effect on thermal-shock cracks and found that the crack length of the longest level showed an increasing trend with the increase of the specimen width. She et al [2002] and Ding et al [2006] evaluated the thermal shock behavior of porous silicon carbide (SiC) ceramics as a function of quench temperature, quench cycles, and specimen thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%