Contribution by J. R. Martí-VargasBased on interest in using demolished concrete blocks (DCBs), the paper by Wu et al. (2013) presents research on the uniaxial behaviours of cubic concrete specimens. The authors should be complimented for producing this detailed paper of interest for the discusser, who would like to offer some comments for the authors' consideration and response, mainly about the size effect on concrete compressive strength and concrete modulus of elasticity.Regarding the effect of cube dimension on compressive strength, the authors found that compressive strength decreases if the cube dimension increases when DCBs are used. However, it has been noted that, for cylindrical specimens, the use of DCBs may induce a slightly stronger size effect on relative compressive strength, based on the compressive strength of specimens with a certain dimension (Wu et al., 2014). Can the authors clarify this for cubic specimens?The authors pointed out that there is a size effect law (shown in Figure 4 of the original paper) that implies a slight size effect on compressive strength for cubic specimens whose dimension is below a certain threshold and a stronger size effect when the dimension is over this threshold. A threshold of 323 . 80 mm was established in Equation 3. Accordingly, the tested 150-300 mm cubic specimens should show less size effect than the 400-600 mm cubic specimens. However, it seems that Figure 5 shows a stronger size effect for the former. Can the authors explain this fact to offer a better understanding?The authors have concluded that the effect of cube dimension on the modulus of elasticity of specimens including DCBs is unclear. Unclear effects have also been observed with cylindrical specimens (Wu et al., 2014). However, it is worth noting that the modulus of elasticity can be related to compressive strength, and a size effect law for the modulus of elasticity by modifying the size effect law for compressive strength has been suggested by Elfahal and Krauthammer (2005). Therefore, an explanation is required as to why a size effect was observed on compressive strength but not on modulus of elasticity.In addition, a marked influence of specimen size on the modulus of elasticity has been reported by Martí-Vargas et al. (2014a). Several series of prismatic specimens with different embedment lengths have been tested using the evolutionary computation for the automated design of algorithms (ECADA) test method (Martí-Vargas et al., 2006). Based on prestress loss due to elastic concrete shortening and transformed cross-section properties (Martí-Vargas et al., 2014b), an early concrete modulus of elasticity at prestress transfer for each specimen was obtained. Higher concrete modulus of elasticity values were obtained for larger specimen cross-sections. A coefficient to account for the specimen cross-section size effect on the modulus of elasticity has been proposed, which agrees with the Model Code (fib, 2010) predictions for concrete modulus of elasticity at prestress transfer. Therefore, this...