2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-023-02431-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effect on fracture behavior of quasi-brittle materials during uniaxial compression tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen from Figure 19, the theoretical prediction value of the tension crack initiation angle when α = 0.8 deviates significantly from the experimental value, and they are not in agreement. Wang et al [46] found a similar pattern in the compression-shear fracture test of gypsum, and the rc obtained by back-calculation based on the test results was larger than that calculated by Equation (11), indicating that Equation (11) may not be suitable for the calculation related to compressive-shear mixed mode fractures. The influence of crack inclination angle on the distribution patterns of the maximum circumferential stresses obtained by fitting and empirical formula corresponding to two values of relative critical size α is shown in Figure 19.…”
Section: Comparison Of Test Results and Theoretical Values At Differe...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As can be seen from Figure 19, the theoretical prediction value of the tension crack initiation angle when α = 0.8 deviates significantly from the experimental value, and they are not in agreement. Wang et al [46] found a similar pattern in the compression-shear fracture test of gypsum, and the rc obtained by back-calculation based on the test results was larger than that calculated by Equation (11), indicating that Equation (11) may not be suitable for the calculation related to compressive-shear mixed mode fractures. The influence of crack inclination angle on the distribution patterns of the maximum circumferential stresses obtained by fitting and empirical formula corresponding to two values of relative critical size α is shown in Figure 19.…”
Section: Comparison Of Test Results and Theoretical Values At Differe...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The maximum axial load and axial displacement were 3 kN and 40 mm, respectively, the precision was 0.1 N, and the loading rate ranged from 0.12 to 30 mm/min. In this NDB tests, displacement-controlled loading was adopted at a rate of 0.8 mm/min [16,41], and the bottom was a fixed steel support. including a servo motor, load sensor, displacement sensor, telescopic rod, fixture, and data acquisition software.…”
Section: Specimen Preparation Methods and Loading Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The friction coefficient of the compacted clay-steel interface was determined using the method [41,42] shown in Figure 13. First, the prepared NDB specimen was placed in the middle of the steel plate.…”
Section: Friction Coefficient Of the Compacted Clay-steel Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%