2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effects and strength fluctuation in nanoscale plasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The factor is due to the fact that a lower strain rate gives more opportunity for thermal nucleation of fracture at the defects. It is interesting to note that similar ideas are applicable to dislocation nucleation in plasticity 41 42 43 44 45 46 , where it has been noted that the likelihood of survival of a metallic nanopillar under stress decreases with time due to nucleation events. Our model is a ‘weakest-link' model, since we assume that the graphene sheet fractures as soon as its weakest GB/TJ defect becomes unstable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The factor is due to the fact that a lower strain rate gives more opportunity for thermal nucleation of fracture at the defects. It is interesting to note that similar ideas are applicable to dislocation nucleation in plasticity 41 42 43 44 45 46 , where it has been noted that the likelihood of survival of a metallic nanopillar under stress decreases with time due to nucleation events. Our model is a ‘weakest-link' model, since we assume that the graphene sheet fractures as soon as its weakest GB/TJ defect becomes unstable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, [52] extended pop-in investigations into multiple types of pop-in modes: a primary pop-in with a large displacement excursion and a number of subsequent pop-ins with comparable and small displacement excursions. The distribution of pop-ins in single FCC crystals has also been investigated to some degree [47] for Cu single crystals, finding that the distribution can be fitted by a Gaussian with mean and variance that depend on grain orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanomaterials and nanostructures are well known to have mechanical properties that greatly differ from that of their bulk counterparts. This includes notable examples such as strengthening mechanisms in nano-grained metals [1][2][3], multilayer nanolaminate composites with enhanced hardness [4][5][6], material size effects [7][8][9][10], and dislocation starvation and mechanical annealing phenomena [11][12][13]. These unique mechanical properties provide potential avenues for engineering nanostructures and surfaces with desirable mechanical properties, benefiting such diverse fields as micro/nano-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS/NEMS), nanotribology, and biomedical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%