1969
DOI: 10.1016/0025-5416(69)90046-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effects in electron transport in metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature dependence of R e (T) between 20 and 295 K has been computed for a value of the thickness, 1156 Å. 12 Results are presented in Fig. 6.…”
Section: ͑23͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature dependence of R e (T) between 20 and 295 K has been computed for a value of the thickness, 1156 Å. 12 Results are presented in Fig. 6.…”
Section: ͑23͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resistivities were respectively 150 and 500 nΩm, which is between 5 and 6 times higher than bulk values. This is typical for very thin films with high surface and grain boundary scattering 9,10 . In addition to low melting point metals we have also made nanostructures with tantalum, which has a very high melting point at 3017 °C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The general topic of dc size effects in metals is the subject of an excellent review by Brandli and Olsen [89]. Three parameters appear at least implicitly in all dc size effects theories: the ratio K = d/b, of the characteristic specimen dimension to the bulk electronic mean free path; the specularity parameter, p, which is the fraction of electrons specularly reflected from the surface; and the product pb b for the bulk metal, which should be a constant independent of size or temperature.…”
Section: Size Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3.5 shows the measured versus the bulk residual resistivity ratio for copper wires of quite reasonable size. One should also note that a magnetic field applied to a metal showing a significant size effect may cause a dramatic decrease in the measured low temperature resistivity [89]. …”
Section: Size Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%