1997
DOI: 10.1080/10584589708013046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effects in polarization switching in ferroelectric thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent studies of the dependence of the size effect in LB March, 2000 Two-dimensional ferroelectricsferroelectric copolymer films on thickness confirm the size effect in the thickness range of 18 to 60 nm [74]. This behavior is consistent with the dominance of the nucleation mechanism; as the films become thinner, the nucleation volume is reduced and becomes energetically less favorable [91,92] until it is completely inhibited. The present results lead to the following conclusions.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Ferroelectric Filmssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…More recent studies of the dependence of the size effect in LB March, 2000 Two-dimensional ferroelectricsferroelectric copolymer films on thickness confirm the size effect in the thickness range of 18 to 60 nm [74]. This behavior is consistent with the dominance of the nucleation mechanism; as the films become thinner, the nucleation volume is reduced and becomes energetically less favorable [91,92] until it is completely inhibited. The present results lead to the following conclusions.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Ferroelectric Filmssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…More recent studies of the finite-size effect reported by extended the thickness range down to 18 nm and determined that the coercive field scaled at the 20.7 power of the thickness [23]. This behavior is consistent with the nucleation mechanism and finite-size scaling; as the films are made thinner, nucleation volume is reduced and becomes energetically less favorable [7,24].…”
Section: (Received 29 June 1999)supporting
confidence: 57%
“…A more effective way to increase the coercive field is to make a particle small enough or a film thin enough to inhibit nucleation [3][4][5][6]. Several mechanisms for this finite-size effect have been proposed, including reduction of nucleation volume, space charge near the electrodes, and surface pinning [2,6,7]. Even in the thinnest ferroelectric films obtained previously, the measured extrinsic coercive field is much smaller than the intrinsic value calculated from the LG theory [1], and consequently there has been relatively little published discussion of the intrinsic coercive field.…”
Section: (Received 29 June 1999)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size effect of different ferroelectric properties has been attributed to the presence of these layers. 29 It has also been suggested that depolarizing fields exist in these layers. The sense of depolarizing manifests in the opposite direction with respect to the field inside the film.…”
Section: Effect Of Space Chargementioning
confidence: 99%