1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.54.4283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effects in the density of states in normal-metal–superconductor and superconductor–normal-metal–superconductor junctions

Abstract: We consider the χ 0-dependence of the density of states inside the normal metal of a superconductor-normal metal-superconductor (SN S) junction. Here χ 0 is the phase difference of two superconductors of the junction. It is shown that in the absence of electron-electron interaction the energy dependence of the density of states has a gap which decreases as χ 0 increases and closes at χ 0 = π. Both the analytical expressions for the χ 0 dependence of the density of states and the results of numerical simulation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different behaviors of the LDOS are expected in cases of junction systems with non-superconducting samples and other shapes such as a triangle, a circle, and so on. In particular, in junction systems such as superconductor-normal metal-superconductor (SNS) junction systems [33][34][35] and superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor (SFS) junction systems [36][37][38], the LDOS is more complicated because of the Andreev reflection and the proximity effect. The nano-structured Josephson junction system is expected as applications such as the nano-SQUID, the quantum computer, and the single flux quantum (SFQ) logic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different behaviors of the LDOS are expected in cases of junction systems with non-superconducting samples and other shapes such as a triangle, a circle, and so on. In particular, in junction systems such as superconductor-normal metal-superconductor (SNS) junction systems [33][34][35] and superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor (SFS) junction systems [36][37][38], the LDOS is more complicated because of the Andreev reflection and the proximity effect. The nano-structured Josephson junction system is expected as applications such as the nano-SQUID, the quantum computer, and the single flux quantum (SFQ) logic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in addition to an SNS junction, a system with four instead of two interfaces will be treated; it is shown schematically in figure 1. Some preliminary results for an NS junction, not containing a self-consistent gap function yet, have been published by Blaauboer et al [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peaks represent discrete energy states. 12 We make the width of the curves, determined by the parameter ␦ in Eϩi␦, wide enough so that the fundamental features can be seen. The numbers in parentheses denote the mode to which the energy belongs.…”
Section: ͑25͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an initial application of the theory the local density of states of normal metal-superconductor ͑NS͒ and SNS junctions were calculated, but the breakdown of the Andreev approximation was not noticed. 12 The paper is organized as follows. First we give a concise account of the main features of the theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation