2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size effects on strength and plasticity of vanadium nanopillars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the size effect plot in Fig. 3B, which shows that, at room temperature, the power law slope of −0.68 for Li is close to those of V (−0.79) and Nb (−0.93) (19), the two bcc metals exhibiting fcc-like deformation and size effect exponent. This plot also reveals that, relative to the shear modulus, Li is the strongest of all reported bcc metals within the studied size range; for example, at a pillar diameter of 1 μm (D/b = 3,300), the relative strength of Li is a factor of 1.7 higher than V and Nb, and a factor of 2.3 higher than W. At 363 K, the size effect slope becomes −1.00, whereas the normalized strength decreases by a factor of ∼3.5 compared with room temperature over the entire size range.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is consistent with the size effect plot in Fig. 3B, which shows that, at room temperature, the power law slope of −0.68 for Li is close to those of V (−0.79) and Nb (−0.93) (19), the two bcc metals exhibiting fcc-like deformation and size effect exponent. This plot also reveals that, relative to the shear modulus, Li is the strongest of all reported bcc metals within the studied size range; for example, at a pillar diameter of 1 μm (D/b = 3,300), the relative strength of Li is a factor of 1.7 higher than V and Nb, and a factor of 2.3 higher than W. At 363 K, the size effect slope becomes −1.00, whereas the normalized strength decreases by a factor of ∼3.5 compared with room temperature over the entire size range.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The result of this normalization yielded a power-law exponent of ∼−0.6. Recently, the small-scale mechanical properties of body centered cubic (BCC) metals have also been explored in uniaxial compression and tension [28][29][30][31]34,37,38,40,51]. It is interesting to note that the deformation characteristics and size effects observed for single-crystalline BCC nanopillars deviate from FCC specimens for reasons attributed to crystal structure [28,51].…”
Section: Influence Of Strain Rate and Nanopillar Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electroplating methods have also produced Cu pillars for both uniaxial tension and compression testing, with the additional capability of creating pillars with diameters below 100 nm [19,20]. Beyond fcc, the effect of size on strength for a variety of crystal structures has been investigated, including bcc [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and hcp [30][31][32]. Computational techniques like molecular dynamics (MD) [33][34][35] and dislocation dynamics (DD) [36,37] have also been widely utilized to shed light on the underlying defect mechanisms leading to this size-dependent strengthening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%