2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size independent fracture energy of concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values determined by this method are dependent on the size and shape of the test specimen, as demonstrated and analysed by several authors in the last decades [2–7]. However, it is still regarded as a universal method for determining the fracture energy of concrete [8–10]. Moreover, the reasons for the variability of the RILEM fracture energy of concrete with the size of the ligament area are a subject of ongoing investigations [10–15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values determined by this method are dependent on the size and shape of the test specimen, as demonstrated and analysed by several authors in the last decades [2–7]. However, it is still regarded as a universal method for determining the fracture energy of concrete [8–10]. Moreover, the reasons for the variability of the RILEM fracture energy of concrete with the size of the ligament area are a subject of ongoing investigations [10–15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still regarded as a universal method for determining the fracture energy of concrete [8][9][10]. Moreover, the reasons for the variability of the RILEM fracture energy of concrete with the size of the ligament area are a subject of ongoing investigations [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values determined by the work-of-fracture method as proposed in RILEM recommendation (RILEM 1985) are dependent on the specimen size and shape used in the test, as demonstrated and analyzed by several researchers in the past (Hu and Wittmann 1992;Kwon et al 2008;Muralidhara et al 2011;RILEM 2004;Vydra et al 2012). The two most popular models to obtain a size-independent specific fracture energy of concrete (also called true fracture energy are the boundary effect model of Hu and Wittmann (1992) and the experimental correction model to avoid energy dissipations proposed by Guinea et al Guinea et al 1992;Planas et al 1992).…”
Section: Size Dependency Of the Specific Fracture Energy Of Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muralidhara et al [16] pointed out a fictitious boundary effect at the initial notch tip using acoustic emission data recorded from three-point-bending notched concrete beams and presented a tri-linear local fracture energy distribution model which consists of an ascending line from zero at the initial crack-tip, a horizontal line and a descending portion approaching zero at the back free boundary. The tri-linear model has been verified experimentally by other researchers [17,18]. Moreover, the size-independent fracture energy of high strength concrete is determined by the tri-linear model [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%