2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5024442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-independent neural networks based first-principles method for accurate prediction of heat of formation of fuels

Abstract: Neural network-based first-principles method for predicting heat of formation (HOF) was previously demonstrated to be able to achieve chemical accuracy in a broad spectrum of target molecules [L. H. Hu et al., J. Chem. Phys. 119, 11501 (2003)]. However, its accuracy deteriorates with the increase in molecular size. A closer inspection reveals a systematic correlation between the prediction error and the molecular size, which appears correctable by further statistical analysis, calling for a more sophisticated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, in all these specialpurpose approaches, ML's role is relegated to only predicting or improving the prediction of enthalpy of formation for a given chemical structure, and some ML-based approaches have the further limitation that they were developed only for certain classes of compounds such as acyclic hydrocarbons, 33 cyclic hydrocarbons, 34 energetic materials, 8 or fuels. 39 Such specialpurpose ML approaches also rely on molecular structures and other descriptors derived from structures, which are provided to a ML model, with the consequence that the ML model itself can neither generate a new molecular geometry nor improve upon it. An alternative to both QM and special-purpose ML approaches comes from a parallel development of general-purpose, data-driven methods based on ML, which target accurate predictions of QM potential energies for a wide range of compounds and can be used as a drop-in replacement for QM or force-field methods in many simulations such as molecular dynamics and geometry optimizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, in all these specialpurpose approaches, ML's role is relegated to only predicting or improving the prediction of enthalpy of formation for a given chemical structure, and some ML-based approaches have the further limitation that they were developed only for certain classes of compounds such as acyclic hydrocarbons, 33 cyclic hydrocarbons, 34 energetic materials, 8 or fuels. 39 Such specialpurpose ML approaches also rely on molecular structures and other descriptors derived from structures, which are provided to a ML model, with the consequence that the ML model itself can neither generate a new molecular geometry nor improve upon it. An alternative to both QM and special-purpose ML approaches comes from a parallel development of general-purpose, data-driven methods based on ML, which target accurate predictions of QM potential energies for a wide range of compounds and can be used as a drop-in replacement for QM or force-field methods in many simulations such as molecular dynamics and geometry optimizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, machine learning (ML) has been added to the quantum chemical toolbox, ,,,, leading to a significant decrease in the computational cost and/or increase in the accuracy of the corresponding calculated properties. The success of a given ML model depends on its chosen set of molecular descriptors, as the representation must fully describe patterns in the desired output values.…”
Section: Machine Learning Models In Thermochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al 30 introduce a size-independent NN model of heats of formation trained on small organic molecules that can be applied to large molecules. For these, the MAE from reference B3LYP numbers is reduced to 1.7 kcal/mol.…”
Section: A Prediction Of Energies and Other Properties Throughout Chmentioning
confidence: 99%