2019 2nd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icomet.2019.8673459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Invariant Handwritten Character Recognition using Single Layer Feedforward Backpropagation Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model was designed for easy testing and collaboration on a web server, utilizing the Google Colab cloud-based web interface for AI experiments. The paper [24] showed recognition of fixed-size handwritten characters using single-layer feed-forward neural networks. Their proposed system focused on offline recognition of numbers and the Latin alphabet.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was designed for easy testing and collaboration on a web server, utilizing the Google Colab cloud-based web interface for AI experiments. The paper [24] showed recognition of fixed-size handwritten characters using single-layer feed-forward neural networks. Their proposed system focused on offline recognition of numbers and the Latin alphabet.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yousaf et al [16] present a methodology for handwritten English character (alphabetic and digital) preprocessing and recognition through an NN with one hidden layer, without using feature extraction. Preprocessing consists of binarization (by Otsu's global thresholding method), segmentation, filtering, and dynamic resizing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach in [13] had an easier task to tackle: recognition of only lowercase letters. The approach in [16], although it declares 7+% better accuracy, it is a result of much easier recognition tasks: recognizing only capital letters or only digits. Finally, the approach in [17], although it shows about 5.5% better performance, it is also due to the much easier task of recognizing only digits and a much larger data set was used.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%