2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.094413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size of linear superpositions in molecular nanomagnets

Abstract: Molecular nanomagnets are zero-dimensional spin systems, that exhibit quantum mechanical behavior at low temperatures. Exploiting quantum-information theoretic measures, we quantify here the size of linear superpositions that can be generated within the ground multiplet of high-and low-spin nanomagnets. Amongst the former class of systems, we mainly focus on Mn12 and Fe8. General criteria for further increasing such sizes are also outlined, and illustrated in the case of spin rings. The actual character (micro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular this behavior has been tested in models where the interaction is restricted to first neighbors [9,10,14], e.g., quantum Ising and X-Y models in an external field, in order to precisely estimate the parameters of the system and to provide useful information about the phase diagram. In view of the attention paid to systems with more sophisticated interaction among lattice sites [15][16][17][18] a question thus naturally arises as to whether criticality may be exploited to enhance metrology in systems with interaction beyond the first-neighbor approximation. * matteo.paris@fisica.unimi.it In this framework, systems described by the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model provide nontrivial examples to assess quantum criticality as a resource for quantum estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular this behavior has been tested in models where the interaction is restricted to first neighbors [9,10,14], e.g., quantum Ising and X-Y models in an external field, in order to precisely estimate the parameters of the system and to provide useful information about the phase diagram. In view of the attention paid to systems with more sophisticated interaction among lattice sites [15][16][17][18] a question thus naturally arises as to whether criticality may be exploited to enhance metrology in systems with interaction beyond the first-neighbor approximation. * matteo.paris@fisica.unimi.it In this framework, systems described by the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model provide nontrivial examples to assess quantum criticality as a resource for quantum estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, molecular nanomagnets [45] are also attracting more interest as a feasible platform for quantum technological purposes [52]. Specifically, molecular nanomagnets, composed by N = 3 main units, have been proved to be useful for quantum thermometry [53] and for coherent-manipulation of three-qubit states [54].…”
Section: The Spin-ring Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QFI H thus represents a general theoretical tool which allows one to compare the size of different cat-like quantum states prepared in a given molecular nanomagnet (see below), and also in different molecules [23].…”
Section: Quantifying the Size Of Schrödinger Cat Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If applied to low-spin molecules with highly-entangled ground states, the calculation of the relative Fisher information leads to the conclusion that linear superpositions of their ground states are in fact rather poor examples of Schrödinger cat states. Broadly speaking, these are systems with highly nonclassical ground states, but the degree of nonclassicality-as quantified by the quantum fluctuations of X-is not significantly enhanced by linearly superimposing the ground states [23]. As a final remark, we would like to mention a possible connection between the QFI of a linear superposition of two eigenstates, |ψ 1 and |ψ 2 , and the transitions |ψ 1 −→ |ψ 2 induced by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR).…”
Section: Quantifying the Size Of Schrödinger Cat Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%