1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3975(97)83807-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size of ordered binary decision diagrams representing threshold functions

Abstract: An ordered binary decision diagram (OBDD) is a graph representation of a Boolean function. It is observed that many practical Boolean functions are represented in feasible size. In this paper, the size of ordered binary decision diagrams representing threshold functions is studied. Two cases are treated: an ordering of variables is given in one case,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we mentioned in Section 4.1, Theorem 4 of Hosaka et al (1997) defines a subclass of regular games for which the size of a BDD representation grows exponentially as a function of n. However, it does not seems that, for this subclass, |W s (Γ )| grows much slower than |BDD(Γ )|. In Example 9 we provide a game Γ with |W s (Γ )| = 1, however |BDD(Γ )| does not seems to increase too much in terms of n. For instance, with n = 8 and n = 9 we obtain respectively |BDD(Γ )| = 27 and |BDD(Γ )| = 32, in contrast to the sizes of each game in MWF, which are n · |W m | = 560 and 1134, respectively.…”
Section: Algorithm 4 Generatemwffromswfmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As we mentioned in Section 4.1, Theorem 4 of Hosaka et al (1997) defines a subclass of regular games for which the size of a BDD representation grows exponentially as a function of n. However, it does not seems that, for this subclass, |W s (Γ )| grows much slower than |BDD(Γ )|. In Example 9 we provide a game Γ with |W s (Γ )| = 1, however |BDD(Γ )| does not seems to increase too much in terms of n. For instance, with n = 8 and n = 9 we obtain respectively |BDD(Γ )| = 27 and |BDD(Γ )| = 32, in contrast to the sizes of each game in MWF, which are n · |W m | = 560 and 1134, respectively.…”
Section: Algorithm 4 Generatemwffromswfmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…There exist simple games Γ for which |BDD(Γ )| grows exponentially in terms of n, independently of the order of the variables. For instance, consider the Theorem 4 of Hosaka et al (1997), which shows a subclass of simple games called weighted games, for which |BDD(Γ )| ∈ Ω(2 √ n/2 ). Additionally, there exists a known result by Wegener which says that almost all QOBDDs for general Boolean functions, not only the monotone ones, have size 2 n /(2n) (Wegener, 1994).…”
Section: Representation Sizes and The Conversion Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [7] the first exponential lower bound of Ω(n2 n 1/2 /2 ) on the OBDD size of a threshold function is proved. Later on this lower bound has been improved up to Ω(n2…”
Section: Results and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Subsection 3.2: We reproduce the family of PB constraints proposed by Hosaka et al (1994), for which no polynomial-size ROBDD exist. For self-containedness, we give a clearer alternative proof than in the original paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%