2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size selective performance of two flexible sorting grid designs in the Northeast Arctic cod ( Gadus morhua ) and haddock ( Melanogrammus aeglefinus ) fishery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences were found for cod, whereas the results for haddock only indicated an effect for the smaller individuals. Despite cod and haddock having different behavioural patterns in the aft part of a trawl (Engås et al 1998, Ferro et al 2007, Sistiaga et al 2016, somewhat like hake and blue whiting, the results in the present study showed no difference in the behavioural response of hake and blue whiting to LED lights.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…No significant differences were found for cod, whereas the results for haddock only indicated an effect for the smaller individuals. Despite cod and haddock having different behavioural patterns in the aft part of a trawl (Engås et al 1998, Ferro et al 2007, Sistiaga et al 2016, somewhat like hake and blue whiting, the results in the present study showed no difference in the behavioural response of hake and blue whiting to LED lights.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…However, placing LEDs around the escape exit was ineffective at stimulating fish escape through the grid escape exit. Based on the results obtained, it appears that LEDs discourage fish from getting close to the area where they are placed, which agrees with the results of Parsons et al (2012) and seems to apply especially to species such as Haddock, whose escape behavior is known to be directed upwards (Winger et al 2010;Sistiaga et al 2016). Therefore, placing the LEDs at the lower part of the Nordmøre grid could be a better option, as it can direct the fish toward the escape exit without contacting the grid first.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…In addition, turning the grid section upside down, with the escape exit facing downwards and LEDs placed at the top of the grid, could increase escape without contacting the grid for species known to seek an escape route downwards, such as Atlantic Cod and various species of flatfish (Rose and Hammond 2014;Sistiaga et al 2016). The use of a long guiding funnel similar to the one used in the Norwegian shrimp trawl fishery tended to allow a lower fraction of small bycatch fish species to escape through the escape exit than was the case with a short guiding funnel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causing mechanism is that fish often seem to stop just in front of the 45 grid and keep a somewhat stationary position up to several minutes before being size sorted in the 46 section and pass it in the direction of the codend. This phenomena leads to fish accumulation at the 47 entrance of the grid section, which combined with high entrance rates can result in that the grid section 48 gets blocked (or clogged) by fish, loses its sorting ability and finally breaks in some cases (Grimaldo 49 et al, 2015;Sistiaga et al, 2016). Therefore, a key to eliminate or at least significantly reduce this risk 50 for grid clogging is to ensure that the fish does not stop and accumulate in front of the grid section 51 before being size sorted by it.…”
Section: Fig 1 39mentioning
confidence: 99%