Size-Specific Dose Estimates Based on Water-Equivalent Diameter and Effective Diameter in Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography

Abstract

BackgroundTo determine the difference in size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs), separately based on effective diameter (deff) and water equivalent diameter (dw) of the central slice of the scan range in computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA).Material/MethodsThere were 134 patients who underwent CTCA examination, were electronically retrieved. SSDEs (SSDEdeff and SSDEdw) were calculated using 2 approaches: deff and dw. The median SSDEs and mean absolute relative difference of SSDEs were calculated. Linear regression model was used to assess the absolute relative difference of SSDEs based on the ratio of deff to dw.ResultsThe median values of SSDEdeff and SSDEdw were 18.26 mGy and 20.56 mGy, respectively (P<0.01). The former was about 10.08% smaller than the latter. The mean absolute relative difference of SSDEs was 10.48%, ranging from 0.33% to 24.16%. A considerably positive correlation was found between the absolute relative difference of SSDEs and the ratio of deff to dw (R2=0.9561, r=0.979, P<0.01).ConclusionsThe value of SSDEdeff was smaller by an average of about 10.08% than SSDEdw in CTCA, and the absolute relative difference increased linearly with the ratio of effective diameter to water equivalent diameter.

Dosis de radiación en tomografía computarizada: observación en tres hospitales de la Región de Valparaíso, Chile

“…En efecto, se trata de dos tipos de índices que van a ser sensibles en forma diferente a distintos puntos en juego. La discusión sobre qué índice de dosis sería mejor y cómo estimarlo sigue activa [24][25][26][27] . La existencia de múltiples índices de dosis probablemente no facilita el trabajo de vigilancia continua y de comparación con posibles valores de referencia.…”

Radiation dosis in computed tomography: observation in three hospitals from the Region of Valparaiso, Chile

“…Indeed, these are two types of indices that are going to be sensitive in a different way at different points involved. The discussion about what dose rate would be better and how to estimate it is ongoing [24][25][26][27] . The existence of multiple dose indices probably does not facilitate the work of continuous surveillance and comparison with possible reference values.…”

Deep Learning-based calculation of patient size and attenuation surrogates from localizer Image: Toward personalized chest CT protocol optimization

“…The CF can be selected based on patient size surrogates, such as effective diameter (D eff ) and water equivalent diameter (DW). Using DW has been recommended as the preferred criterion in the definition of CFs, since it takes into account not only patient size but also the tissue composition of the patient's body, especially in body regions with higher tissue inhomogeneities, such as the thorax [9]. The primary barrier on the way of automated implementation of this process is the lack of quantitative CT localizers.…”