2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c13148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size-Tunable Metal–Organic Framework-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles for Enzyme Encapsulation and Large-Substrate Biocatalysis

Abstract: Immobilizing enzymes on nanoparticles (NPs) enhances the cost-efficiency of biocatalysis; however, when the substrates are large, it becomes difficult to separate the enzyme@NP from the products while avoiding leaching or damage of enzymes in the reaction medium. Metal–organic framework (MOF)-coated magnetic NPs (MNPs) offer efficient magnetic separation and enhanced enzyme protection; however, the involved enzymes/substrates have to be smaller than the MOF apertures. A potential solution to these challenges i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lysozyme is a good model because both large (∼μm) and small (∼nm) size substrates can be catalyzed by this enzyme ( Vocadlo et al., 2001 , Kao et al., 2014 ). Meanwhile, MOFs/COFs are advanced porous platforms for enzyme encapsulation ( Howarth et al., 2016 , Majewski et al., 2017 , Drout et al., 2019 , Wang et al., 2020 , Gkaniatsou et al., 2017 , Lyu et al., 2014 , Lian et al., 2017 , Li et al., 2020 , Farmakes et al., 2020 , Neupane et al., 2019 ). Note that, a unique feature of SDSL-EPR is that it is immune of the background matrices (under low water volume; see below) ( Pan et al., 2021a ).…”
Section: Before You Beginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysozyme is a good model because both large (∼μm) and small (∼nm) size substrates can be catalyzed by this enzyme ( Vocadlo et al., 2001 , Kao et al., 2014 ). Meanwhile, MOFs/COFs are advanced porous platforms for enzyme encapsulation ( Howarth et al., 2016 , Majewski et al., 2017 , Drout et al., 2019 , Wang et al., 2020 , Gkaniatsou et al., 2017 , Lyu et al., 2014 , Lian et al., 2017 , Li et al., 2020 , Farmakes et al., 2020 , Neupane et al., 2019 ). Note that, a unique feature of SDSL-EPR is that it is immune of the background matrices (under low water volume; see below) ( Pan et al., 2021a ).…”
Section: Before You Beginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strategy for using the temperature responses of MOFs is to modify their porous surface with thermo‐responsive polymers, e.g., poly(N‐isopropyl acrylamide) (PNIPAM), which possesses a reversible lower critical solution temperature (LCST) phase transition from a hydroswollen state to a shrunken dehydrated state. [ 71–76 ] In other words, this polymer is hydrophilic and dissolves in water when the temperature is below the T c at ≈32 °C, yet it also forms aggregates. [ 77–79 ] Using this unique feature, Karmakar et al ( Figure 5 ) reported that a chromium‐based MOF (MIL‐101) modified by PNIPAM exhibited thermo‐responsive water capture and release behavior.…”
Section: Single Stimulus Mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complicated syntheses and harsh conditions, the degradation of the drug exhibits great potential applications. [ 137–141 ] In this regard, Kim et al reported an enzyme‐responsive MOF composed of Zr‐based porphyrinic MOFP (CN224 MOF) and HA. [ 142 ] The MOF was coated by enzyme‐responsive HA through multivalent coordination bonding between the Zr cluster and carboxylic acids of HA.…”
Section: Single Stimulus Mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the potential application of magnetic porous MOFs as the support for enzyme immobilization needs to be explored. To date, there are only a few reports on the preparation of magnetic ZIF biocomposites [7,10,13,21,24–26] . For example, Ricco co‐workers have prepared the enzyme horseradish peroxidase and iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles in a one‐pot synthesis and performed reusable biocatalysts [10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%