2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-002-8293-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size variation and foraging rate in bumblebees ( Bombus terrestris )

Abstract: Size polymorphism is an important life history trait in bumblebees with strong impact on individual behavior and colony organization. Within a colony larger workers tend to serve as foragers, while smaller workers fulfill inhive tasks. It is often assumed that size-dependent division of labor relates to differences in task performance. In this study we examined size-dependent interindividual variability in foraging, i. e. whether foraging behavior and foraging capability of bumblebee workers are affected by th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
192
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
14
192
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Red Clover) both between bumblebee species (e.g. Inouye 1980) and even within a colony (tongue length correlating with worker body size: Harder 1985; size-specific foraging performance: Spaethe and Weidenmüller 2002). In our dataset proboscis length of B. lapidarius males and B. terrestris workers were very similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Red Clover) both between bumblebee species (e.g. Inouye 1980) and even within a colony (tongue length correlating with worker body size: Harder 1985; size-specific foraging performance: Spaethe and Weidenmüller 2002). In our dataset proboscis length of B. lapidarius males and B. terrestris workers were very similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…To study the effects of continuous diversity on colony fitness and efficiency for particular tasks, researchers often focused on the function of larger and smaller workers in the colonies without manipulating worker diversity (e.g. Goulson et al 2002;Spaethe and Weidenmüller 2002;Peat et al 2005;Couvillon and Dornhaus 2010;Westling et al 2014). In order to test whether colony fitness is affected by colony-level worker size diversity, including the colony-level emerging properties of worker size diversity and not only the functions of large and small workers, we manipulated colonies to reduce worker size diversity in test colonies while natural diversity was retained in control colonies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further colony was excluded from this analysis as no bees were lost during the entire experiment. Body mass in B. terrestris is strongly correlated with body size (Goulson et al, 2002;Spaethe & Weidenm¨uller, 2002). For consistency across lost and returning bees, we used the departure mass of each bee on its first foraging bout.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%