2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sizing, geometry and topology optimization of trusses via force method and genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
67
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For just the size problem the resulting weight of 2491kg is comparable to the 2540kg of Sivakumar et al (2004) and the 2474kg of Meesomklin (2001). For the simultaneous optimization approach, the GA's result of 1230kg compares well to those of 1282kg and 1235kg obtained by Tang et al (2005) and Rahami et al (2008) These comparisons indicate that the algorithm selected for this study provides reasonable results. Therefore, the algorithm can be regarded as an average performing optimization routine which makes it eligible for being used in a quantitative comparison study.…”
Section: -Bar Trusssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For just the size problem the resulting weight of 2491kg is comparable to the 2540kg of Sivakumar et al (2004) and the 2474kg of Meesomklin (2001). For the simultaneous optimization approach, the GA's result of 1230kg compares well to those of 1282kg and 1235kg obtained by Tang et al (2005) and Rahami et al (2008) These comparisons indicate that the algorithm selected for this study provides reasonable results. Therefore, the algorithm can be regarded as an average performing optimization routine which makes it eligible for being used in a quantitative comparison study.…”
Section: -Bar Trusssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The problem with some of the most common and robust optimization algorithms such as Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony, and Harmony Search, is that they entail a large number of iterations for reaching the optimum solution [1][2][3][4]. This is a significant barrier when applying exact simulations to real life engineering optimization problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the computational cost and convergence rate, three examples (10, 25, and 72-bar truss) are selected from refs [1][2][3][4]. The algorithm was developed using Python programming language and ran on a Centrino, 1.4 GHZ computer.…”
Section: Computational Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight w and the bias b can be obtained by solving the following optimization problem: is the kernel function [4,5].…”
Section: Genetic Support Vector Regression Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%