2020
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2020.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sizing up mechanical testing: Comparison of microscale and mesoscale mechanical testing techniques on a FeCrAl welded tube

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not explore the extent of damage caused by the technique, but rely on prior studies that have shown that the damage for metals is limited to a few micrometers below the surface. 7,8,19 It is not expected that, for the laser parameters used here, the damage should significantly exceed prior findings. For the 316L foil and AM91, a laseraffected region a few micrometers below the surface would comprise less than 5% of the response, well within the variation observed from measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not explore the extent of damage caused by the technique, but rely on prior studies that have shown that the damage for metals is limited to a few micrometers below the surface. 7,8,19 It is not expected that, for the laser parameters used here, the damage should significantly exceed prior findings. For the 316L foil and AM91, a laseraffected region a few micrometers below the surface would comprise less than 5% of the response, well within the variation observed from measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Gigax et al used femtosecond machining to create tensile samples for a coarse-grained metal which resulted in good correlation with that of bulk testing. 7 The HAZ in this study would have accounted for an insignificant fraction of the total gauge volume, meaning that its effects could be ignored. Another study also looked at the effects of the femtosecond laser process on the production of micropillars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardness and modulus measurements were computed using the Oliver-Pharr method, assuming a Poisson ratio of 0.3 [37]. For microtensile testing, small scale tensile specimens were fabricated using a femtosecond laser cutting system and procedure described in previous studies [38][39][40]. Tensile specimens were cut using an output pulse width of 350 fs, wavelength of 1053 nm, repetition rate of 20 kHz, and energy of 10 µJ focused through a 5x objective.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%