2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002080100233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skein construction of idempotents in Birman-Murakami-Wenzl algebras

Abstract: Abstract. We give skein theoretic formulas for minimal idempotents in the Birman-Murakami-Wenzl algebras. These formulas are then applied to derive various known results needed in the construction of quantum invariants and modular categories. In particular, an elementary proof of the Wenzl formula for quantum dimensions is given. This proof does not use the representation theory of quantum groups and the character formulas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If c has coordinates (i, j) ( i -th row, and j -th column), then the corresponding point in D 2 is j+i √ −1 n+1 . In [2] we have constructed minimal idempotentsỹ λ ∈ K λ . Let us recall their main properties in the generic case (i.e.…”
Section: Idempotentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If c has coordinates (i, j) ( i -th row, and j -th column), then the corresponding point in D 2 is j+i √ −1 n+1 . In [2] we have constructed minimal idempotentsỹ λ ∈ K λ . Let us recall their main properties in the generic case (i.e.…”
Section: Idempotentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A representative set of simple objects is the infinite set Γ(B n ) , so that the category is not pre-modular. We have the following specialized formula for the quantum dimensions (see [2,Prop. 7.6] …”
Section: The Odd Orthogonal Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here whereỹ λ is the 0-graded minimal idempotent defined in [5],P + is the idempotent p Analogously, the trace of (id V ⊗P + )(ỹ (2) ⊗ id S ) is nonzero. Therefore, p λS µ is a composition of non-negligible morphisms.…”
Section: Remark 22mentioning
confidence: 99%