Skeletal anchorage system for open-bite correction

Umemori, Mikako; Sugawara, Junji; Mitani, Hideo; Nagasaka, Hiroshi; Kawamura, Hiroshi

doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70345-8

Cited by 504 publications

(296 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

261

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Skeletal orthodontic anchorage systems provide stationary anchorage for various tooth movements without the need for active patient compliance and with no undesirable side effects.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distal Movement of Maxillary Molars Using Miniscrew Anchorage in the Buccal Interradicular Region

Yamada

Kuroda

Deguchi

et al. 2009

The Angle Orthodontist

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To quantify the treatment effects of interradicular miniscrew anchorage and to confirm the validity of the clinical usage of interradicular miniscrews in the distal movement of maxillary molars in nonextraction treatment. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four maxillary molars were moved to the distal using miniscrews placed in the interradicular space between the second premolar and the first molar at an oblique angle of 20 to 30 degrees to the long axis of the proximal tooth. The teeth were evaluated as to how the molars were moved to the distal with the use of lateral cephalograms and dental casts. Results: Maxillary molars were moved to the distal by 2.8 mm with distal tipping of 4.8 degrees and intruded by 0.6 mm. Maxillary incisors were moved to the distal by 2.7 mm with palatal tipping of 4.3 degrees. Molar extrusion and/or consequent mandibular rotation was not observed in any patient. Conclusion: Miniscrews placed in the maxillary interradicular space provide successful molar distal movement of 2.8 mm without patient compliance and with no undesirable side effects such as incisor proclination, clockwise mandibular rotation, or root resorption. (Angle Orthod. 2009;79: 78-84.)

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distal Movement of Maxillary Molars Using Miniscrew Anchorage in the Buccal Interradicular Region

Yamada

Kuroda

Deguchi

et al. 2009

The Angle Orthodontist

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…If an anchorage appliance is the choice, it has to be rigid to withstand oral functions as well as long spans of archwires. 32 Nowadays, dental implants, 37 miniscrews, 38,39 and miniplates 40 are preferred as orthodontic anchorage units, which provide skeletal anchorage. Dental implants can be placed in the retromolar or palatal region to tract unerupted teeth in the mandibular and maxillary posterior region, respectively.…”

Section: Orthodontic Approach In Ccdmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orthodontic Care of Cleidocranial Dysplasia Patients

Nur¹,

Ulkur²,

Nalbantgil³

2015

Turkish Journal of Orthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare congenital deformity inherited as an autosomal genetic trait with the prevalence of 1:1,000,000. It is characterized by dental defomities such as retained primary teeth, presence of supernumerary teeth, skeletal dicrepancy, malocclusion and retarded/absence of eruption of permanent teeth. The orthodontist take part in the team for patients with CCD to resolve the eruption delay of permanent teeth and correct skeletal discrepancies. The aim of this review is to discuss the history, genetic backgrounds, clinical and dental features, different dental treatment approaches and orthodontic management of CCD. (Turkish J Orthod 2015;28:31-37)

show abstract

“…9 Roberts et al used springs to apply force to titanium screws in rabbits in 1984, and concluded the implants provided adequate anchorage for orthodontic force levels. 7 Several investigators have reported the use of osseointegrated implants for uprighting molars to minimise adverse sequelae, such as extrusion. [10][11][12] In 1997 Kanomi placed mini-bone screws between the root apices of the mandibular incisors to intrude the lower anteriors.…”

Section: Types Of Implant Anchorsmentioning

confidence: 99%