1997
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199715010-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal muscle blood flow is not a determinant of insulin resistance in essential hypertension

Abstract: Differences in whole-body glucose uptake in hypertensive and control subjects are not likely to be related to differences in insulin-induced stimulation of muscle blood flow.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2B). The action of insulin in these animals r e flects the situation observed on insulin administration to some (9,39-41) but not all (42) hypertensive humans, where no decrease in vascular resistance is observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…2B). The action of insulin in these animals r e flects the situation observed on insulin administration to some (9,39-41) but not all (42) hypertensive humans, where no decrease in vascular resistance is observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This may explain why defects in blood flow have not been observed in previous studies performed in patients with essential hypertension. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Consistent with this hypothesis, Baron et al 23 and Utriainen et al, 22 who used 8 to 35 times higher doses of insulin than those used to study patients with essential hypertension, did find correlations between mean arterial pressure and leg blood flow in normal subjects. Our finding of a defect in mean blood flow in patients with essential hypertension at an insulin concentration of 450 mU/L is in line with the latter observations and provides the first evidence of a defect in the vasodilatory effect of insulin in these patients.…”
Section: Insulin and Mean Muscle Blood Flow In Essential Hypertensionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In normal subjects, however, inverse relations have been found in two studies between mean arterial blood pressure and insulin-stimulated blood flow. 22,23 In the latter studies, 22,23 the insulin concentra-tions were high enough to clearly (on the average by 80% to 117%) increase blood flow above basal values, whereas in the studies performed in hypertensive subjects, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] infusion of insulin either did not increase blood flow significantly or the increase was modest (10% to 30%). We hypothesized that if defects in insulin-stimulated blood flow do indeed characterize patients with essential hypertension, the stimulus, that is, the dose of insulin or duration of the insulin infusion, must be high enough to clearly increase blood flow in normal subjects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 However, interpretation of results from studies in older volunteers and patient groups is less clear; for example, in type 2 diabetes and hypertension there are data that report blunting of insulin-mediated vasodilation that parallels changes in insulin sensitivity, 8,9 although contrasting data report no defect in the vascular action of insulin. 10,11 However, it is possible that these conflicting results are due to other factors such as age, obesity, and dyslipidemia, which have been shown to be important determinants of both insulin action and vascular endothelial function. [12][13][14] In the present study, we hypothesized that insulin-resistant subjects (patients with essential hypertension and type 2 diabetes) would display blunting of both insulinmediated vasodilation and basal endothelial NO production compared with subjects carefully controlled for potentially confounding factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), and lipid profile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%