2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal muscle radiodensity is prognostic for survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
125
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
125
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The SMD of human muscle can be obtained by CT scans and is measured as mean Hounsfield units (HU) of the cross‐sectional muscle area 21, 23. Recent studies on cancer patients have indicated that reduced SMD is associated with poorer survival,14, 24 and former results from the present population suggested that SMD may be a more important prognostic factor than skeletal muscle index (SMI) in advanced NSCLC 25. Despite the emerging evidence on the negative impact of low muscle mass, less attention has been paid to the importance of muscle wasting for muscle function in cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The SMD of human muscle can be obtained by CT scans and is measured as mean Hounsfield units (HU) of the cross‐sectional muscle area 21, 23. Recent studies on cancer patients have indicated that reduced SMD is associated with poorer survival,14, 24 and former results from the present population suggested that SMD may be a more important prognostic factor than skeletal muscle index (SMI) in advanced NSCLC 25. Despite the emerging evidence on the negative impact of low muscle mass, less attention has been paid to the importance of muscle wasting for muscle function in cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…At baseline, deceased patients had a lower body mass index (24 kg/m 2 vs. 25 kg/m 2 , P  = 0.026) and had lost more body weight (5.4% vs. 2.4%, P  = 0.019) than alive patients. Moreover, deceased patients had more severe anorexia (SNAQ score: deceased vs. alive patients: 146, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 vs. 168, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20; P  = 0.005), more symptoms (QLQ‐C30: deceased vs. alive patients: 33 2–66 vs. 15 6–69 ; P  < 0.0001), a poorer quality of life (QLQ‐C30: deceased vs. alive patients: 58 16–100 vs. 66 0–100 ; P  = 0.002) and a lower functional capacity (QLQ‐C30: deceased vs. alive patients: 64 18–97 vs. 82 33–100 ; P  < 0.0001 and ECOG; P  < 0.0001) than alive patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The muscle‐wasting process in cachexia is demonstrated by a reduction of muscle size and also an increase in muscle fat infiltration,2 as assessed by the muscle density measured by CT scan. Interestingly, low muscularity and muscle fat infiltration are recognized as independent risk factors of poor survival in cancer patients, regardless of body weight 3, 4, 5, 6. Therefore, it is expected that inhibition of muscle‐wasting process may represent an effective strategy to treat cancer cachexia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[85, 86] Skeletal muscle wasting and resultant functional impairment significantly affect QoL. Cancer-related muscle loss is multifactorial, resulting in asthenia and functional impairment similar to that seen in patients with age-related sarcopenia as well that manifested by active muscle break-down.…”
Section: 0 Muscle Weakness In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%