1955
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1955.18.3.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal Muscle Reflexes of Splanchnic and Intercostal Nerve Origin in Acute Spinal and Decerebrate Cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus ANOVA showed a statistically significant effect of dose on the size of the early VS reflex, but no effect of stimulus number. (Downman, 1955) and rabbit (Alderson & Downman, 1960). In spinalized animals, stimulation of the splanchnic nerve evokes reflex volleys in all the body wall nerves, with the largest responses being obtained from the lower thoracic and upper lumbar nerves (Downman, 1955 immediately adjacent nerves and decrease in size progressively above and below this point (Downman, 1955).…”
Section: Somato-somaticmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus ANOVA showed a statistically significant effect of dose on the size of the early VS reflex, but no effect of stimulus number. (Downman, 1955) and rabbit (Alderson & Downman, 1960). In spinalized animals, stimulation of the splanchnic nerve evokes reflex volleys in all the body wall nerves, with the largest responses being obtained from the lower thoracic and upper lumbar nerves (Downman, 1955 immediately adjacent nerves and decrease in size progressively above and below this point (Downman, 1955).…”
Section: Somato-somaticmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The thoracic dorsal roots contain afferents that excite motoneurones monosynaptically in the same and adjacent segments (Sears, 1964b;Kirkwood & Sears, 1982 a, b) and polysynaptically with a wider distribution (Downman, 1955;Aminoff & Sears, 1971 However, our principal evidence concerning the influence of dorsal root afferents is that many of the experiments described above were performed with the ipsilateral dorsal roots cut in up to five segments, always including the ones used for efferent recordings a, b; Kirkwood et al 1981b). An approximately equal number of the experiments were performed with the roots intact.…”
Section: Effects Of Dorsal Root Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removing a large part of this input reduces the 'dilution' or other effects already described but, since threshold for the motoneurones that contribute to the histogram was still achieved, albeit at an elevated level of C02, then it is likely that this respiratory input had been replaced by some other excitatory input. We presume that this other input was provided by spinal cord interneurones released from descending controls (Downman, 1955;cf. Sherrington & Sowton, 1915;Eccles & Lundberg, 1959), but we do not know whether these interneurones have respiratory patterns of activity or not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For phrenic nerve recording, the changes in amplitude and duration of the phrenic discharge were assessed once per cycle to determine their maximal variations. For the majority of mechanical and chemical tests, the depression of phrenic activity remained stable for a few breaths (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Thus reported data corresponded to the averaged changes in amplitude and duration of phrenic discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The existence of direct connections between parietal pleural afferents in internal intercostal nerves and phrenic motoneurons is similar to an inhibitory visceromotor reflex similar to that reported between the splanchnic afferents and the diaphragm (1, 2, 12). As for the pleural-to-phrenic reflex here described, splanchnic-to-phrenic reflex involves the activation of nonmyelinated afferent fibers (2) directly connected with ipsilateral phrenic motoneurons because the reflex persists in animals spinalized between C1 and C2 (1,12). The splanchnic-to-phrenic reflex may explain inhibition of diaphragm electromyogram after peritoneal effraction with laparotomy (4) or simple laparoscopy (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%