2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal muscle-resident MSCs and bone formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have identified additional candidate HO including endothelial or nonendothelial Tie2+ cells and Glast‐Cre cells . Using markers such as PDGFRα, Sca1, and S100A4, others have shown that Tie2+ and Glast‐cre cells which contribute to HO are likely mesenchymal cells . Our findings confirm the coexpression of these mesenchymal cell markers in Scx‐creERT2 cells, in both trauma or BMP‐scaffold implantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies have identified additional candidate HO including endothelial or nonendothelial Tie2+ cells and Glast‐Cre cells . Using markers such as PDGFRα, Sca1, and S100A4, others have shown that Tie2+ and Glast‐cre cells which contribute to HO are likely mesenchymal cells . Our findings confirm the coexpression of these mesenchymal cell markers in Scx‐creERT2 cells, in both trauma or BMP‐scaffold implantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These findings indicate that scleraxis‐lineage restricted cells have the capacity to form HO in the settings of trauma and with hyperactive BMP receptor activity. Recent studies have identified additional candidate HO including endothelial or nonendothelial Tie2+ cells and Glast‐Cre cells . Using markers such as PDGFRα, Sca1, and S100A4, others have shown that Tie2+ and Glast‐cre cells which contribute to HO are likely mesenchymal cells .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be speculated that, rather than BM-MSC, extraskeletal OS could be initiated by MSCs from soft tissues (muscle-derived MSC, ASC, etc.) presenting mutations that favor osteogenic differentiation and/or influenced by pathologically osteogenic signals from the microenvironment [ 79 ]. In this regard this type of tumors could be related to fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, a rare genetic disorder of connective tissue characterized by the presence of activating mutations in the ACVR1 gene, which encode a BMP type I receptor [ 80 ].…”
Section: Cell-of-origin For Osmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because samples were examined by immunohistochemistry after 8 weeks, we do not know whether the initial representation of donor cells was higher, with progressive replacement by host cells as the newly formed woven bone was remodeled. It has been known for a long time that skeletal muscle contains osteoprogenitor cells, 14 but the identity of the progenitor cells within skeletal muscle that formed new tissue in the present experiment was not investigated here; candidates include satellite cells, 15 mesenchymal stem cells, 16 muscle-derived stem cells, 17 and endothelial lining cells from blood vessels within muscle. 18 Our data are also relevant to a discussion of the fate of chondrocytes during endochondral ossification, the mechanism through which the appendicular skeleton develops, 19 fractures heal, 20 heteropic ossification develops in FOP, 7 and genetically modified muscle forms bone in rat femora.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%